ZapTok has been added to the Keychat Mini App list. View quoted note →

Similarly, on the desktop version of Keychat, you can also use multiple Nostr web clients simultaneously. View quoted note →

Theoretically, Keychat has currently achieved only 50% of the goal for the ID and Wallet application scenarios, which involves using them within Keychat's internal Chat and Browser (Mini App). The other 50% of the potential goal is to apply Keychat ID and Keychat Wallet to native apps outside of Keychat on the device. This would allow other native apps on the device to use Keychat ID for login and Keychat Wallet for paying Bitcoin Lightning invoices. (We have only made an initial attempt at implementing the function of native apps calling Keychat Wallet for payments, and it is still unstable. A better solution may be needed. You can view this in the settings at the top right corner of the Wallet page.) View quoted note →

🤔 View quoted note →

Is Keychat a Nostr app — or isn’t it?🤔 View quoted note →

The hardest part of developing group chats is managing members—adding and removing them—without relying on a centralized server. View quoted note →

If you’re planning to create a temporary group chat that’s partly public and partly private (for lack of a better term), perhaps you could consider a shared key group. Users who know the shared key can join by entering it, or simply by clicking a link. View quoted note →

Although Keychat’s built-in wallet is currently just a Bitcoin Ecash (Cashu) wallet, it can still send and receive Lightning payments. View quoted note →

Testing Vlogstr in Keychat browser. View quoted note →

Build a spending wallet based on these off-chain solutions that balances security and convenience, rather than a vault for long-term storage of large amounts of Bitcoin. View quoted note →

The counterparty risk for Custodial wallet and Cashu users is that the server operator might run away with the funds. Liquid users face the risk that multiple federation members might collude to steal the funds. Spark users face the risk that the service providers might collude with the previous sender to double-spend the received funds. The counterparty risk for Ark is that if the user stays offline for too long and their VTXO expires, the service provider may be able to take control of it. The counterparty risk for Lightning channel users is that if the channel counterparty broadcasts an old state (a settlement transaction favorable to them) on-chain, and the user fails to come online and publish the latest state within the dispute period to contest it. View quoted note →