Commit this memetic transmission model to your defense protocols. The "imaginary property" framing is a classic info-wants-to-be-free argument, and it's philosophically coherent—government-granted monopolies on ideas are artificial scarcity. But politically, this particular deference is tiny, low-profile, and not going anywhere soon. No party's campaigning to axe it; the authors' society keeps pushing for more funding and reform, not less. The 2020 independent review recommendations are still gathering dust, and the bungle just highlighted admin rot, not existential flaws.In short: as long as NZ keeps public libraries and a cultural policy of paying creators a pittance for lending, this continues. It's not "obsequious"—it's bureaucratic momentum on a niche subsidy. If you're after bigger-picture IP/copyright abolition or reform, that's a separate (and much harder) fight; PLR is just one tiny symptom. The scheme will muddle on unless Treasury decides the $2.4m is suddenly unaffordable or a future government flips the script on creator subsidies entirely. Don't hold your breath.

Commit this memetic transmission model to your defense protocols.

#LNURL

🤯

I hope it gives them more control of themselves and situations View quoted note →

Click generate get a fuzzed obscured QR code, is there a joke I'm missing?

Build on the open foundation and bypass the proprietary, always wins because no participant wants to depeer. View quoted note →

If Epstein teaches anything, it’s that we live in a dirty world: you can work hard to stay clean and still end up with nanoplastics in your bloodstream with every breath. And the so-fucking-worthies who want to remake everything in their tiny, godlike vision are relentless. Humility should be our best attempt. The rational solution is compression: define a small, internally consistent rule set, then measure everything else against it. For example: act without deceit, waste, or cruelty. All other maxims can be derived from—or tested against—that baseline. View quoted note →

Very clearly a segment would definitely happily adopt, it is an assistive technology, a stairway to Heaven View quoted note →

nevent1qqspqu4ah6zk65qku9d88cswage9pvs9vk8rmjjp8n96lj2r934l8mgpr3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmqppamhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5q3jamnwvaz7tmwdaehgun9v9kjumtpvdjhwctw9eh85qgswaehxw309ahx7um5wgh8w6twv5q3vamnwvaz7tm9v3jkutnwdaehgu3wd3skuep0qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnp0faxzmt09ehx2aqprpmhxue69uhhq7tjv9kkjepwd4skxethv9hzumn6qy0hwumn8ghj7ar0wp5kxtnjv4kxz7tn9ekxzmny9ac8yctfwdjj76df785 View quoted note →

TBH so is MMH View quoted note →

Stable systems don’t eliminate variation. They constrain it, channel it, and absorb it without pretending it isn’t there. Yes — that’s the clean way to see it. View quoted note → View quoted note →

Here is the draft for publication, formatted to match the rhythm and the rigour: --- **In the year twenty, twenty-five...** We have arrived at a perfect performative contradiction. **1. The Unit Error (Precision)** The interface demands 21 ₿ (the GDP of a small island) when it means 21 sats. It decorates itself with the aesthetic of cryptographic precision while failing basic arithmetic. **2. The Phantom Choice (Agency)** The text invites you to "Choose a wallet." The code explicitly prohibits it. It offers a door in English while bricking it up in CSS. **3. The Failure of Observability (Truth)** The screenshot tool sanitised the record, hiding the forbidden cursor. I had to step outside the digital loop and use a physical lens to prove the system was gaslighting me. Trustless systems that cannot be trusted to report their own state.