I know very little about BIP-110, but it seems to me that a temporary change's only value is to give them time to formulate a permanent change. That failed, but there is still lots of resentment over ordinals and other such non-monetary data on the blockchain. There's still plenty of time to work on a permanent change and on building consensus so said permachange will be accepted by a majority of miners & mining pools.

Hachyderm.io

mekka okereke :verified: (@mekkaokereke@hachyderm.io)

@cmdrmoto @mathowie@xoxo.zone @MissGayle@urbanists.social I wish! But unfortunately, no it's not. Bitcoin was designed by fashy hyper-capitalist...

So there are lots of improvements possible, but BTC and some other major cryptocurrencies are the only hope that ethnic minority groups have. No matter how hard we push to make banks treat people fairly, it doesn't work. It never has. All they have to do is teeter on the edge of recession and our leaders cave and send shovelfuls of taxpayer money their way. We have to make them obsolete, so they lose their power to pick winners and losers

@Tristan Brice Velloza Kildaire someone in the Fediverse is exploring Reticulum. Since you're the only user I know, I linked to your Soapbox account.

https://www.ccn.com/news/crypto/california-bill-seize-inactive-crypto-wallet/ California bill allowing state to seize "inactive" crypto wallets after three years passes Assembly, awaits Senate action. Not believed to affect self-hosted 'cold' wallets, just exchange wallets.