Island life

Start9 port of UTXOracle has been published!

We have the technology

Berry szn

Price check aisle 3

My gfs DVDs

Completely unrelated to number go up, I am putting on my two weeks at work tomorrow. Funny how that works.

I want to stay humble but I also want to text my FIL back what he asked me during his first 10% dip: “Are we worried about bitcoin?”

Guess I’ll go to the meetup tonight.

Stack harder. Lift harder. The rest is easy.

I quit bit-evangelizing this cycle and it shows. No texts during ATH.

Salty bois

BSOD after KDE Linux update. Wasted a day. Let’s see if Ubuntu treats me any better.

My kind of breakfast scramble

Talked to a coworker from a few years ago. He thought BTC was still 20k 😂. Still not interested 🤷🏻‍♂️

Gm

Interesting footnote: It is worth going through the literature of the late seventeenth and early eighteenth century to see how the words "democracy" and "democrat" appear exclusively as terms of contumely and reprehension. They served this purpose for a long time both in England and America, much as the terms "bolshevism" and "bolshevist" serve us now. They were subsequently taken over to become what Bentham called "impostor-terms”, in behalf of the existing economic and political order, as synonymous with a purely nominal republicanism. They are now used regularly in this way to describe the political system of the United States, even by persons who should know better-even, curiously, by persons like Bertrand Russell and Mr. Laski, who have little sympathy with the existing order. One sometimes wonders how our revolutionary forefathers would take it if they could hear some flatulent political thimblerigger charge them with having founded "the great and glorious democracy of the West.

Really enjoyed AJN’s Our Enemy, the State. “The secret of freedom will be the individual "making himself the depository of the powers respecting himself, so far as he is competent to them, and delegating only what is beyond his competence, by a synthetical process, to higher and higher orders of functionaries, so as to trust fewer and fewer powers in proportion as the trustees become more and more oligarchical." This idea rests on accurate observation, for we are all aware that not only the wisdom of the ordinary man, but also his interest and sentiment, have a very short radius of operation; they can not be stretched over an area of much more than township-size; and it is the acme of absurdity to suppose that any man or any body of men can arbitrarily exercise their wisdom, interest and sentiment over a state-wide or nation-wide area with any kind of success.”