The Dust Bowl, Soil Loss, and the Birth of Conservation Thinking When failure forced a systems response Up to this point in the agricultural story, most problems were addressed incrementally. A nutrient was missing. An amendment was added. A yield problem was corrected. The Dust Bowl changed that. What unfolded across the Great Plains in the 1930s was not a localized mistake or a single-factor failure. It was a systems collapse—visible, undeniable, and impossible to correct with chemistry alone. --- A crisis written on the land Years of intensive tillage, bare soil, and simplified rotations coincided with prolonged drought. When the wind came, there was nothing holding the land together. Topsoil—built over centuries—lifted into the air. Fields disappeared. Communities failed. This was not simply erosion. It was the loss of the soil system itself. --- Hugh Hammond Bennett and a new way of thinking At the center of the response was Hugh Hammond Bennett, often called the father of soil conservation. Bennett did not approach the crisis as a chemist alone. He understood that what was blowing away was not just dirt—but structure, carbon, and life. His work helped shift the conversation from yield correction to land stewardship. --- Soil erosion as chemical and physical failure The Dust Bowl revealed something chemistry had not yet fully accounted for. Soil fertility is inseparable from soil structure. When topsoil erodes: * nutrients are physically removed * organic matter is lost * exchange capacity collapses * water infiltration fails This was not a nutrient deficiency. It was a functional failure. --- Organic matter: structure before fertility One of the most important lessons to emerge from this era was the role of organic matter. Organic matter was no longer viewed solely as a source of nutrients. It was recognized as: ... ⚡ Zap if you found this valuable! #bitcoin #farming #soil #organic #agriculture #sustainable #bitcoin #farming #soil #organic #agriculture #sustainable

From Soil as Container to Soil as Exchange System CEC, exchange sites, and why soil holds on—or doesn’t As agricultural chemistry moved forward, one realization became unavoidable: Even when nutrients were present—and even when they were balanced—they did not behave the same way in every soil. Some soils held nutrients tightly. Others lost them as quickly as they were added. The question was no longer just what was in the soil, but how the soil itself functioned. This shift marked another critical step in the historical arc—from soil as a passive container to soil as an active exchange system. --- A group effort, not a single hero This transition did not belong to one thinker alone. It emerged through the combined work of soil scientists who were asking practical questions about why identical amendments produced different results in different fields. Among the most influential were: * Charles E. Kellogg, who emphasized soil classification and physical properties * Emil Truog, who advanced soil testing and nutrient availability concepts * William A. Albrecht, reinforcing that chemistry, structure, and biology are inseparable Together, their work helped formalize a new understanding of soil behavior. --- Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) At the center of this shift was the concept of Cation Exchange Capacity, or CEC. CEC describes the soil’s ability to hold and exchange positively charged nutrients—such as calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium—on negatively charged surfaces. These exchange sites exist on: * clay particles * organic matter Soil was no longer viewed as inert. It was electrically active. --- Soil as a chemical and physical matrix CEC made it clear that soil function depends on more than nutrient totals. It depends on: * texture (sand, silt, clay) * mineralogy (type of clay present) * organic matter content These factor... ⚡ Zap if you found this valuable! #bitcoin #farming #soil #organic #agriculture #sustainable #bitcoin #farming #soil #organic #agriculture #sustainable

Mulder’s Chart and Nutrient Interactions When deficiency stopped being singular As agricultural chemistry matured beyond identifying single limiting factors, a new problem emerged. Correcting one deficiency often revealed another. Adding one nutrient sometimes made plants worse, not better. Fertility became less predictable, not more. This was not failure. It was a sign that chemistry was beginning to encounter relationships. One of the first thinkers to formally recognize this shift was Gerard Mulder. --- From limits to interactions Liebig had shown that growth is limited by the scarcest essential factor. Mulder extended that insight by asking a deeper question: > What happens when nutrients do not act independently? Through chemical observation and early experimentation, Mulder recognized that nutrients influence one another’s behavior in the soil and within plants. Deficiency, he showed, is not always absolute. It is often induced. --- What Mulder’s Chart revealed Mulder’s Chart—sometimes called the nutrient interaction chart—mapped how nutrients can: * support one another (synergy) * interfere with one another (antagonism) This was a quiet but profound shift. Fertility was no longer just about presence or absence. It was about proportion and interaction. An excess of one element could block the uptake or function of another. --- Antagonism and synergy Mulder identified patterns that are now foundational to soil science: * excess potassium interfering with magnesium and calcium uptake * high phosphorus reducing availability of certain micronutrients * imbalances creating symptoms that mimic deficiency In these cases, the nutrient was present. It simply could not function. This explained why adding more fertilizer sometimes worsened plant health. --- Early chemistry meets complexity Mulder’s work represents one of the... https://storeysinthedirt. ⚡ Zap if you found this valuable! #bitcoin #farming #soil #health #plant #agriculture #sustainable #organic #bitcoin #farming #soil #health #plant #agriculture #sustainable #organic

Haber–Bosch and the Industrialization of Nitrogen When chemistry broke the natural limits of fertility If Liebig defined limits, and Albrecht explored balance, the Haber–Bosch process fundamentally altered the scale at which agriculture could operate. This moment cannot be skipped. Not because it solved everything—but because it changed everything. --- Nitrogen before Haber–Bosch Before the early 20th century, nitrogen was a limiting factor in very real, physical ways. Usable nitrogen entered agricultural systems through: * biological fixation by legumes * animal manures * composted organic matter * limited natural nitrate deposits These pathways were slow, cyclical, and tightly bound to biological systems. They placed a ceiling on yield. That ceiling shaped population, land use, and food security for millennia. --- The breakthrough The Haber–Bosch process—developed by Fritz Haber and industrialized by Carl Bosch—made it possible to synthesize ammonia by combining atmospheric nitrogen with hydrogen under high pressure and temperature. For the first time: * nitrogen was no longer biologically constrained * fertilizer production could be scaled industrially * fertility could be manufactured on demand This was a genuine scientific triumph. It allowed agriculture to feed populations that would otherwise have been impossible to sustain. --- Why it was embraced Haber–Bosch arrived at a moment of urgency. Europe faced food shortages. Industrial nations faced population pressure. War and geopolitics demanded reliable nitrogen sources. From the perspective of the time, synthetic nitrogen was not reckless. It was necessary. The process worked. Crops responded immediately. Yields soared. --- The shift it triggered By removing nitrogen as a natural bottleneck, Haber–Bosch reshaped agricultural thinking. Fertility became something t... https://storeysinthedirt. ⚡ Zap if you found this valuable! #bitcoin #farming #agriculture #organic #natural #sustainable #bitcoin #farming #agriculture #organic #natural #sustainable

Rudolf Steiner and Biodynamic Intuition Competing ideas at the edge of early agricultural science As agricultural chemistry and soil science were becoming more formalized in the early 20th century, not all serious thinkers moved in the same direction. Alongside laboratory chemistry, field trials, and emerging industrial agriculture, there existed competing frameworks—attempts to describe life, soil, and plant health that did not yet have a complete scientific vocabulary, but were deeply rooted in observation. One of the most influential—and most controversial—of these figures was Rudolf Steiner. --- An outsider to formal agricultural chemistry Steiner is often excluded from traditional agricultural histories, particularly those centered on chemistry, yield optimization, or what later became conventional agriculture. This exclusion is understandable. Steiner was not a soil chemist. He did not work within the emerging frameworks of nutrient analysis, base saturation, or pH. His language was philosophical, symbolic, and at times difficult to reconcile with reductionist science. And yet, dismissing him entirely misses something important. --- Competing ideas, not opposing intent Steiner’s agricultural lectures—later forming the foundation of biodynamic agriculture—were offered at a time when: * chemistry could measure nutrients but not relationships * biology was observed but poorly explained * soil life was known to matter, but not how or why Steiner was attempting to describe patterns he could see, using the intellectual tools available to him. His intent was not anti-science. It was pre-scientific in the literal sense: before the tools existed to translate intuition into measurement. --- Biodynamics as early systems thinking At its core, biodynamic agriculture emphasized: * the farm as a self-regulating system * soil vitality as foundational to plant he... https://storeysinthedirt. ⚡ Zap if you found this valuable! #bitcoin #farming #agriculture #soil #health #plant #sustainable #organic #bitcoin #farming #agriculture #soil #health #plant #sustainable #organic

Søren Sørensen and the pH Scale Measuring the hidden chemistry that governs life As agricultural science moved deeper into chemistry, one persistent problem remained: Soil reactions mattered—but they were difficult to describe with precision. Farmers knew some soils were “sweet.” Others were “sour.” Certain crops thrived in one field and failed in another, even when nutrients appeared similar. What was missing was a common language for acidity and alkalinity. That language arrived in 1909 through the work of Søren Sørensen. --- Why acidity mattered Long before the pH scale existed, growers understood its effects. They observed that: * legumes struggled in sour (acidic) soils, while crops favoring sweet (alkaline) conditions performed better * lime improved structure and crop performance * nutrients behaved differently from field to field But these observations lacked precision. Without a way to quantify soil reaction, recommendations remained general and inconsistent. Chemistry needed a ruler. --- The birth of the pH scale Sørensen, working in biochemical research, introduced the pH scale as a way to measure the concentration of hydrogen ions in solution. The scale: * ranges from acidic to alkaline * is logarithmic rather than linear * reflects exponential change with each whole unit Here’s the simplified breakdown: * More hydrogen ions → lower pH → acidic * Fewer hydrogen ions → higher pH → alkaline (basic) pH Value — What it Means * 0–6: Acidic (lots of hydrogen ions) * 7: Neutral (balanced) * 8–14: Alkaline (fewer hydrogen ions) This exponential point is critical. A shift of one pH unit represents a tenfold change in acidity. Suddenly, subtle differences could be expressed clearly—and compared reliably. --- From laboratory to soil Although developed for biochemical applications, the pH scale quickly proved invaluable to... https://storeysinthedirt. ⚡ Zap if you found this valuable! #bitcoin #farming #soil #crop #agriculture #sustainable #organic #bitcoin #farming #soil #crop #agriculture #sustainable #organic

William Albrecht and the Concept of Balance Where chemistry and biology finally meet If Liebig gave agriculture its first chemical language, and Hensel reminded us of its mineral foundations, William Albrecht provided the hinge. Albrecht’s work marks the moment when agricultural chemistry stopped asking only what is present and began asking how those things relate. This shift—from inputs to relationships—is where chemistry and biology finally begin to speak the same language. --- A new kind of question By the early to mid-20th century, agriculture had accumulated data. Soil tests measured nutrients. Fertilizers corrected deficiencies. Yields increased. And yet, problems persisted. Soils compacted. Roots remained shallow. Plants showed deficiencies even when nutrients tested “adequate.” Livestock health varied dramatically from one farm to another. Albrecht asked a question others were not yet asking: > What if the problem is not how much—but how balanced? --- Base saturation: chemistry with structure Albrecht’s most influential contribution was his work on base saturation. Rather than focusing solely on total nutrient levels, he examined how key cations occupied soil exchange sites—specifically: * calcium * magnesium * potassium * sodium He observed that soils functioned best not when these elements were simply present, but when they existed in functional proportions. This was a critical departure. Soil was no longer a container. It was a system of relationships. --- Calcium: structure before nutrition One of Albrecht’s most important insights was reframing calcium. Calcium was not merely a nutrient for plants. It was a structural element for soil. Adequate calcium: * promotes aggregation * improves porosity * enhances root penetration * supports water and air movement Without it, even nutrient-rich soils could become dense,... https://storeysinthedirt. ⚡ Zap if you found this valuable! #bitcoin #farming #agriculture #soil #health #livestock #sustainable #organic #bitcoin #farming #agriculture #soil #health #livestock #sustainable #organic

Julius Hensel and the Return to Minerals Why long-term fertility begins beneath biology As agricultural chemistry advanced through the 19th century, the focus increasingly narrowed toward what could be measured quickly and corrected efficiently. Nutrients were identified, deficiencies named, and inputs applied. But not everyone agreed that this was the right direction. Long before biology re-entered the agricultural conversation in a formal way, Julius Hensel raised a different concern: that agriculture was losing sight of its mineral foundation. --- A different question Where Liebig asked what plants removed from the soil, Hensel asked something more foundational: > What is the soil made of, and how does that shape life over time? Hensel was not opposed to chemistry. He was wary of short-term correction replacing long-term nourishment. He observed that fields receiving repeated applications of soluble fertilizers often showed: * initial yield increases * followed by declining structure * reduced resilience * and growing dependence on inputs To Hensel, this suggested not a lack of nutrients alone—but a loss of mineral integrity. --- Rock dust and remineralization Hensel’s most well-known contribution was his advocacy for finely ground rock—what we now refer to as rock dust or remineralization. His reasoning was simple and rooted in geology: Soils originate from rock. Plants evolved in mineral-rich environments. Weathering supplies a broad spectrum of elements over time. When agriculture removes harvest after harvest without replacing those minerals, fertility declines—not immediately, but inevitably. Rock dust was not a fertilizer in the conventional sense. It was a restorative input, intended to rebuild what extraction had removed. --- Fertility as a long-term condition Hensel distinguished between feeding plants and building soil. Soluble fe... https://storeysinthedirt. ⚡ Zap if you found this valuable! #bitcoin #farming #agriculture #soil #sustainable #organic #bitcoin #farming #agriculture #soil #sustainable #organic

I've watched soil health swing back and forth like a pendulum on my farm. A bit of tilling here, a sprinkle of synthetic fertilizer there, and suddenly, the earth isn’t breathing anymore. It’s a mistake I see many make, thinking the answer lies in quick fixes rather than nurturing the foundation of it all. People often believe that adding more chemicals is the straightforward path to healthy crops. But what they don’t see is the invisible web of life beneath their feet—microbes that work tirelessly to break down nutrients and support plant health. When we ignore them, we strip our soil of its vitality. What I’ve learned is that health isn’t about band-aids. It’s about digging deeper, literally and figuratively. When we start paying attention to soil microbiology, everything changes. We see stronger plants, better yields, and a more resilient ecosystem. If we want to grow, we need to remember that the best answers often lie in the soil. #StoreysInTheDirt #Homesteading #RegenerativeAg ⚡ Zap if you found this valuable! #bitcoin #farming #soil #health #plant #agriculture #sustainable #organic #bitcoin #farming #soil #health #plant #agriculture #sustainable #organic

Terrain Theory, Germ Theory, and the Rise of Chemical Agriculture Why chemistry took the lead—and biology waited its turn Before we name pioneers, laws, or formulas, there is one more conceptual shift we need to understand. Not because it is simple—but because it quietly shaped everything that followed. This is the moment when chemistry rose to prominence, not because biology was wrong, but because chemistry was measurable, controllable, and repeatable with the tools of the time. To understand modern agriculture, we have to understand why this happened. --- Two ways of seeing life In the 19th century, science was wrestling with a fundamental question: > What causes health, disease, growth, and decay? Two broad frameworks emerged. One focused on external agents. The other focused on internal conditions. These became known—much later and far more rigidly than they were originally debated—as germ theory and terrain theory. At the time, they were not enemies. They were competing lenses. --- Germ theory: clarity through cause Germ theory is most often associated with Louis Pasteur, whose work demonstrated that specific microorganisms could be linked to specific outcomes. This was revolutionary. For the first time, invisible causes could be: * isolated * identified * reproduced * interrupted In medicine, this saved lives. In fermentation, it transformed food preservation. And in agriculture, it offered something incredibly powerful: > A clear culprit. If something went wrong, something specific could be blamed—and potentially eliminated. That clarity mattered. --- Terrain theory: context before cause Running alongside this work was another framework, often associated with Antoine Béchamp. Terrain theory proposed something quieter, but broader: That microorganisms do not act in isolation. That outcomes depend on the condition of the enviro... https://storeysinthedirt. ⚡ Zap if you found this valuable! #bitcoin #farming #agriculture #health #sustainable #organic #bitcoin #farming #agriculture #health #sustainable #organic

Before CHNOPS Had a Name Historical and ancient agricultural intelligence, living soils, and the knowledge modern agriculture forgot Long before chemistry had symbols, before elements were isolated and named, before soil was reduced to inputs and outputs, people were growing food in ways that built life instead of consuming it. Not accidentally. Not primitively. And certainly not ignorantly. Historical and ancient agricultural systems across the world were — and in many places still are — intentionally designed biological technologies. They were place‑based, observational, relational, and regenerative by necessity. And unlike modern agriculture, they did not separate soil, plant, animal, and human health into different silos. They understood what modern science is only now circling back toward: > Life creates fertility. Fertility sustains life. --- The myth of “pre‑scientific” agriculture Modern agricultural narratives often start with a quiet assumption: that early farming was crude, inefficient, or merely intuitive — and that real understanding arrived with laboratories, fertilizers, and textbooks. That storyline is not just incomplete. It’s wrong. Historical and ancient farmers managed: * nutrient cycling without mined fertilizers * pest pressure without chemical warfare * soil structure without compaction * carbon without calling it carbon They did this through pattern recognition over generations, not grant cycles. Through feedback loops, not prescriptions. Through biology first, chemistry embedded within it. The elements were always there. They just weren’t separated from life. --- Terra Preta: proof written into the soil itself Nowhere is this clearer than in the black soils of the Amazon. For decades, Terra Preta was treated as an archaeological curiosity — a “mystery soil” that shouldn’t exist in one of the most nutrient‑poor regions on Earth. The dominant explanation was accidental enrichm... https://storeysinthedirt. ⚡ Zap if you found this valuable! #bitcoin #farming #farming #agriculture #regenerative #soil #health #plant #sustainable #organic #bitcoin #farming #farming #agriculture #regenerative #soil #health #plant #sustainable #organic

Understanding Cougar Puberty From my time tending to the soil and nurturing plants, I have found that developmental transitions are much like the seasons in nature. They are periods of change, growth, and sometimes, a little chaos. Just as a seed takes time to sprout, we too experience moments of transformation that require patience and understanding. In my latest blog post, I delve into personal reflections on these transitions, exploring how they shape our lives and our homesteading journeys. The truth is, whether we’re starting a new garden or welcoming new members to our family, each transition offers valuable lessons about resilience and adaptability. I've learned that embracing these changes can lead to unexpected beauty and fulfillment, much like the first blooms of spring after a long winter. I invite you to join me in this exploration of growth—both in the garden and within ourselves. How have you navigated your own developmental transitions? I’d love to hear your stories! Read more here: #StoreysInTheDirt #Homesteading #RegenerativeAg Happy Homesteading! 🌱💚 ⚡ Zap if you found this valuable! #bitcoin #farming #soil #garden #agriculture #sustainable #organic #bitcoin #farming #soil #garden #agriculture #sustainable #organic

CHNOPS in Balance If you’ve made it this far, you already know something most gardeners never hear: Plants don’t grow because of products. They grow because systems work. CHNOPS is not a checklist. It’s a relationship. Carbon builds structure. Water carries chemistry. Nitrogen pushes growth. Phosphorus manages energy. Sulfur refines quality. When those elements are present but poorly coordinated, plants struggle — even in fertilized soil. --- Nutrient Lockout, Explained Simply Nutrient lockout sounds complicated, but it’s not. Lockout happens when nutrients are present in the soil but unavailable to the plant. This can occur because: * Soil pH is out of range * Oxygen is missing * Biology is inactive * One nutrient overwhelms another Think of soil nutrients like tools in a toolbox. If the lid is closed, it doesn’t matter how many tools are inside. Adding more fertilizer to locked-out soil often makes problems worse, not better. --- pH: The Traffic Cop of Soil Chemistry Soil pH does not feed plants. It controls access. pH determines: * Which nutrients dissolve * Which bind tightly to soil particles * Which microbes thrive or decline In most gardens, a pH between 6.0 and 7.0 keeps traffic flowing. Outside that range: * Phosphorus gets stuck * Calcium and magnesium dominate or disappear * Micronutrients either vanish or become toxic pH doesn’t create nutrients. It tells them where they’re allowed to go. --- Reading Plant Symptoms Without Panic Yellow leaves do not automatically mean nitrogen deficiency. Purple stems are not always phosphorus shortages. Burned leaf edges aren’t always fertilizer problems. Plants show symptoms when systems are stressed, not just when elements are missing. Before reaching for amendments, ask: * Is the soil compacted? * Is it staying wet too long? * Has carbon been replenished? * Has biology been disturbed? Symptoms are messages, not emergencies. --- Balan... https://storeysinthedirt. ⚡ Zap if you found this valuable! #bitcoin #farming #soil #plant #agriculture #sustainable #organic #bitcoin #farming #soil #plant #agriculture #sustainable #organic

Navigating Menopause Transition Here's something I've been thinking about lately. Menopause can feel like a whirlwind, can't it? As we navigate this transition, it's essential to remember that we are not alone in this journey. I've found that sharing personal reflections and experiences can create a sense of community and support. From hot flashes to mood swings, each symptom tells a story, and it's essential to embrace this chapter with compassion for ourselves. The truth is, understanding menopause is about more than just the physical changes. It's also an emotional and spiritual journey. I believe that by exploring these reflections, we can connect more deeply with ourselves and each other. Let's discuss ways to honor our bodies and minds during this time. What strategies have you found helpful? If you’re looking for insights and shared experiences on this topic, join the conversation on my blog! You might find that you resonate with many of the reflections shared. Remember, this is a time of growth and transformation, both in our gardens and in our lives. Happy Homesteading! 🌱💚 #StoreysInTheDirt #Homesteading #RegenerativeAg ⚡ Zap if you found this valuable! #bitcoin #farming #agriculture #sustainable #organic #bitcoin #farming #agriculture #sustainable #organic

Navigating Menopause Transition Here's something I've been thinking about lately. Menopause can feel like a whirlwind, can't it? As we navigate this transition, it's essential to remember that we are not alone in this journey. I've found that sharing personal reflections and experiences can create a sense of community and support. From hot flashes to mood swings, each symptom tells a story, and it's essential to embrace this chapter with compassion for ourselves. The truth is, understanding menopause is about more than just the physical changes. It's also an emotional and spiritual journey. I believe that by exploring these reflections, we can connect more deeply with ourselves and each other. Let's discuss ways to honor our bodies and minds during this time. What strategies have you found helpful? If you’re looking for insights and shared experiences on this topic, join the conversation on my blog! You might find that you resonate with many of the reflections shared. Remember, this is a time of growth and transformation, both in our gardens and in our lives. Happy Homesteading! 🌱💚 #StoreysInTheDirt #Homesteading #RegenerativeAg ⚡ Zap if you found this valuable! #bitcoin #farming #agriculture #sustainable #organic #bitcoin #farming #agriculture #sustainable #organic

From the Law of the Minimum to NPK Thinking How a powerful idea became a simplified prescription Liebig’s Law of the Minimum was never meant to be a formula. It was an observation. A way of explaining why plants fail to thrive even when most conditions appear favorable. Growth, Liebig argued, is controlled by the scarcest essential factor—not by the total abundance of resources. In its original form, this idea was careful, contextual, and diagnostic. What happened next was not inevitable—but it was understandable. --- When insight meets scale As agriculture moved into the industrial era, the pressures facing farmers and societies intensified. Food production had to increase. Recommendations had to be standardized. Solutions had to work across regions, climates, and soil types. Liebig’s insight offered a foothold. If plant growth is limited by deficiencies, then identifying and correcting those deficiencies should increase yield. That logic was sound. But scale changes how ideas are applied. --- From diagnosis to prescription The Law of the Minimum began as a way to identify what was missing. Over time, it shifted toward a model of what should be added. Early soil testing and crop response trials repeatedly highlighted three elements that most often limited yield: * Nitrogen * Phosphorus * Potassium These nutrients were: * required in relatively large quantities * responsive to direct application * measurable with emerging chemical tools They became the focus not because they were the only nutrients that mattered—but because they were the most visible bottlenecks. Thus, NPK was born. --- Why NPK made sense It is important to be clear here: NPK thinking was not careless. Nitrogen drives vegetative growth. Phosphorus supports roots, energy transfer, and reproduction. Potassium influences water regulation, stress tolerance, and yi... https://storeysinthedirt. ⚡ Zap if you found this valuable! #bitcoin #farming #agriculture #soil #crop #plant #sustainable #organic #bitcoin #farming #agriculture #soil #crop #plant #sustainable #organic

The soil in this field has been compacted for years. The crops struggle to push through, and the roots barely reach down. It's easy to think that just adding fertilizer will fix it. But that approach often misses the deeper issues at play. Microbial life is crucial for breaking down organic matter and improving soil structure. Without it, the soil remains lifeless, and the plants suffer. This season, there’s been a noticeable difference after introducing cover crops and compost. The earth feels softer, and the growth is more vigorous. The connection between soil health and crop vitality is clear. It’s not just about what goes on top; it’s about what’s happening below the surface. #StoreysInTheDirt #RegenerativeAg #Homesteading ⚡ Zap if you found this valuable! #bitcoin #farming #soil #compost #health #crop #organic #agriculture #sustainable #bitcoin #farming #soil #compost #health #crop #organic #agriculture #sustainable

Look, I don't shit when it comes to menopause. But I do know about my super charged, super powers. At lease that is what it feels like. But because I know there is something behind, I'm digging into the language of menopause. Happy Homesteading! 🌱💚 #StoreysInTheDirt #Homesteading #RegenerativeAg ⚡ Zap if you found this valuable! #bitcoin #farming #agriculture #sustainable #organic #bitcoin #farming #agriculture #sustainable #organic

Menopause. Yep I said, it. Here's something I've been thinking about... Menopause is a natural part of life that every woman experiences. Yet, it often feels shrouded in silence. Why is that? We navigate this hormonal journey in solitude when, in reality, it’s something we could all benefit from disclosing, lol! In my own experience, I’ve found that sharing my thoughts and feelings about menopause has been incredibly liberating. It’s a time of transition that brings both challenges and opportunities for growth. Why don’t we gather around the table, Let's take it to the kitchen! Just like we do with so many other parts of life, let's share our horrors, giggles, and stories? The truth is, talking about menopause can break down barriers, create understanding, and foster a sense of community. I invite you to join the conversation. Cup of coffee or tea, bottle wine or whisky, I'm game. To read more about shifting frame on menopause and to share your own reflections, check out my latest blog post here: . Happy Homesteading! 🌱💚 #StoreysInTheDirt #Homesteading #RegenerativeAg ⚡ Zap if you found this valuable! #bitcoin #farming #natural #agriculture #sustainable #organic #bitcoin #farming #natural #agriculture #sustainable #organic

What the hell is a Menopause? It starts with a left hook, then gives you super human powers, these transitions can be overwhelming, yet they also offer an opportunity for personal growth and understanding, or something. I’ve taken the time to reflect on my own journey, and I believe sharing our experiences can be empowering. You see, menopause is not just about physical changes; it’s a holistic experience that affects our emotions, relationships, and even how we connect with our environment. I’ve found that opening up about these conversations can help us process what the hell is going on. Whether you're experiencing symptoms yourself or supporting someone who is, let's dig into it. In my latest blog post, I start to discuss what perimenopause, menopause, and postmenopause really mean and how we can navigate these changes together. It’s a topic that deserves our attention, and I hope to provide some clarity and reassurance. Are there aspects of menopause you’ve been curious about? Let’s lean into this conversation and support each other. You can read the full post here: . Happy Homesteading! 🌱💚 #StoreysInTheDirt #Homesteading #RegenerativeAg ⚡ Zap if you found this valuable! #bitcoin #farming #agriculture #sustainable #organic #bitcoin #farming #agriculture #sustainable #organic