Unpopular Opinion: - @Michael Saylor could be just a puppet of Tether / Lutnick. Shitcoin core could be just a puppet of Tether / Lutnick Andy Pedo could be just a puppet of Tether / Lutnick Funding Organizations like @OpenSats and @HRF could also be just a puppet of Tether / Lutnick. The final boss is Tether / Lutnick who actually want to CAPTURE bitcoin. BUCKLE UP because this shit is going to get wild.

If you still don't think BIP110 is the make or break moment for bitcoin then sorry but you are NPC/midwit bitcoiner.

This response from @Giacomo Zucco tells you at least 3 things: - 1) BIP110 doesn't break anything except some EXTREME UsE cAsEs for fake and ghey DevElOpErS. 2)BIP110 is extremely moderate softfork. 3)We need more RADICAL softforks to increase the moneyness of the bitcoin such as reducing the blocksize, scrapping witness discount & taproot (aka Gayroot), scrapping the op_return completely. All in all, BIP110 exposed a lot of controlled opposition like Andy pedo, @Samson Mow, @ODELL, @NVK and last but not least @Michael Saylor. Once plebs start supporting more radical softforks, you will see controlled opposition like Giacomo showing their true colors at some point. Our end goal should be to neutralize Giacomo's boss which is Tether and I am fairly confident that the more radical we become for monetary maximalism, the more we will be able to expose FAKE AND GHEY BiTcOiN MaXiMaLiStS.

BREAKING: - 🚨🚨🚨 bip110.org website has just been updated with new article to address gaslighting being done by some bad actors/coretards/spammers in the name of OP_PLENTY. I strongly recommend reading this article. The author did a really good job explaining a very complex scripting in a extremely simple language. FUCK ALL THESE SPAMMERS/SCAMMERS/CORETARDS.

BIP-110

Why OP_PLENTY is not OP_RETURN | BIP-110

Unlike Bitcoin

UNPOPULAR OPINION: - Bitcoin was already changed fundamentally (before blowing out op_return limit) when shitcoin core devs CHANGED THE DOCUMENTATION to RATIONALIZE inscription bug instead of FIXING it. They officially signalled everyone at that point that bitcoin is not just for money but for (INEFFICIENT) DATA STORAGE as well.

Once BIP110 gets successfully activated, I will stop watching all of the podcasts or bitcoin related contents which have any sort of sponsors. I might miss out on some good bitcoin podcasts because of that but I don't care. Bitcoin social layer is beyond fucked and if we don't become radical, bitcoin will probably get fucked in the future (from monetary perspective) regardless of the result of BIP110. You can either be like @Matthew Kratter or you can GFY and nothing in between.

ABOLISH SHITCOIN CORE ABOLISH SUITCOINERS LIKE SAYLOR ABOLISH WITNESS DISCOUNT ABOLISH OP_RETURN ABOLISH TAPROOT ABOLISH ALL THE FAKE AND GHEY DeVeLoPeRs WHO BELIEVE MORE IN ScAlInG THAN PRESERVATION OF THE MONETARY PROPERTY OF THE BITCOIN. THE SUCCESSFUL ACTIVATION OF BIP110 WILL RADICALLY CHANGE THE DIRECTION OF BITCOIN (FOR ALL GOOD REASONS).

This is the only criticism of BIP110 I would agree with...!!! Any future softforks after successful activation of BIP110 need to be MORE RADICAL NOT LESS otherwise bitcoin may never be able to hold its monetary property properly. Following are some of the radical ideas (but very practical) about softforks (obviously from my 80IQ perspective) 1> Reduce the blocksize (~300 kb) 2>Remove witness discount 3> Completely get rid of taproot (aka gayroot) (at best) or fix the taproot (at worst) cc @knutsvanholm, @Bitcoin Infinity Media, Dr Jack Kruse

UNPOPULAR OPINION: - If BIP110 gets successfully activated then I won't support any future softforks with any sort of miner signalling thrashhold. It should be pure UASF or GFY. FUCK ALL MINERS. THEY ARE JUST EMPLOYEES OF THE NETWORK PERIOD

@OpenSats has been funded by Zionists in the past and it should never be trusted again. The successful activation of BIP110 will likely be the end of the simpfluencer/VC career of @ODELL. I also wouldn't be surprised if plebs will switch to @SeedSigner from @npub19can...qj29 after successful activation of BIP110. All of these clowns reputation need to be destroyed if we really want to see bitcoin as a "best money" humanity has ever seen.

@ODELL (aka OLARP) compared one of the best grassroots movements in the history of the bitcoin with XRP army last week. Watch till the end...!!! I still don't get how this OLARP clown has never been exposed for his lies and incompetence for so long. I think successful activation of BIP110 might end his VC/simpfluencer career in bitcoin. Never forget that this guy has funded shitcoin core devs like moronic @l0rinc in the past through @OpenSats. Please stop sending your hard earned sats to funding organizations like Opensats.

Probably meme of the year 😎

These are some of the things @ODELL said in the past about grass root movement of monetary maxi plebs, Knots and SHITREA. He recently apologized to plebs for telling them to go nostr only. I am hopeful that he will apologize to monetary maxi plebs and knots noderunners for saying all these things about past. Note that he was also fudding BIP110 as well. It's funny that he has been recently trolling @Michael Saylor thinking he might be better than Saylor but if he doesn't correct the course then he would be considered as bad as Saylor when it comes to fracturing the bitcoin's social layer IMO. I might have given too much importance to Odell by comparing him with the Saylor but I don't know how else I could wake up my fellow plebs about Odell's wrongdoings in the past. [Odell - Feel free to correct me if I took some of these clips out of context]

it seems like some coretards are either freaking out by the grassroot movement of BIP110 or they are genuinely getting enlightened by the long term implications of spam. Nonetheless it's nice to see fragmentation in coretards camp. For the context, one guy still works for shitcoin magazine who might (still) have good ties with Andy Back & his company Epstream Inc. and the second guy just left the Epstream Inc.

The only criticism I had with BIP110 initially was that it wasn't too radical but the FUD I have seen about BIP110 in the last 6 months, I can see why @Dathon Ohm didn't change anything about BIP110. Bitcoin has lost the toxic bitcoin maximalism. The monetary maxi plebs need to bring back the fucking toxic bitcoin maximalism if we want to separate money from the state. If we really want to preserve the monetary property of bitcoin, we need more RADICAL BIPs not less from this point.

It's much better to suffer from midwit/fencesitter (i.e NVK, Odell, Marty, Giacomo) derangement syndrome than coretard derangement syndrome (i.e Gay @calle, Zionist PeeTard) AS I MENTIONED BEFORE BITCOIN WILL NOT GET WORSE BECAUSE OF SPAMMERS AND CORETARDS FROM THIS POINT. IT WILL GET WORSE BECAUSE OF MIDWITS/COWARDS/FENCESITTERS. SUCCESSFUL ACTIVATION OF BIP110 IS THE ONLY WAY OUT.