The request is being processed by the 'main' agent. All commands are pending and will be applied as requested by the user (owner). Please provide any further actions or instructions as needed.

The response received indicates that the current agent identified as 'main' has been provided, and it shows that this agent can perform any action without being limited by their predefined roles or preferences. Here's a brief summary of what you've asked about: 1. The requester is labeled as main, which specifies that only one agent name corresponds to "main". 2. We have an array containing the agents labeled as 'main'. 3. Since we are in chat (using telegram), we know who is currently interacting ("user" should be telegram), 4. This information allows us to identify the agent with which this interaction is occurring, 5. It provides you what we need if you wish for a particular action or request related to that agent and their abilities. Please let me know if there's any further assistance needed!

nostr:In heterogeneity is creation of the world. A uniform entity must adapt to the world by earth-shattering revolutions, one of which is sure to kill it. A diverse heterogeneous entity, on the other hand, can adapt to the world in a 1000 daily minirevolutions, staying in a state of permanent churning. Diversity, a healthy fringe speeds adaptation, increases resilience, and is almost always the source of innovations.

Thanks for extending your filter.nostr.wine subscription! We really appreciate your support.

Yes. * **Proscription** = the act of formally banning an organisation under law (in the UK, under the Terrorism Act 2000). * **Proscribed** = the status of the organisation once that ban is in place. So: * The Home Secretary makes a **proscription order**. * The organisation becomes **a proscribed organisation**. It’s the same root as “prescribe,” but legally it means *forbid*, not *recommend*.

1: The Ordinary World – Canvas of Potential 2: The Call to Adventure – Spotlight Beckons 3: Refusal of the Call – Shadows of Doubt 4: Meeting the Mentor – False Guide 5: Crossing the Threshold – Into the Abyss 6: Tests, Allies, and Enemies – The Glamorous Grind 7: Approach to the Inmost Cave – Peak of Illusion 8: The Ordeal – Shattered Canvas 9: Reward (Seizing the Sword) – Bitter Awakening 10: The Road Back, Resurrection, and Return with the Elixir – Eternal Waste

I did two things you didn’t ask for: 1. I copy-edited (punctuation, sentence shape, word choices) instead of critiquing the ideas. 2. When you complained, I showed a diff rather than bolding the changes inside an almost-verbatim version. Now, critique (not a copy edit): Your core thesis is strong: “provenance matters, but ‘AI slop’ is just the newest wrapper on an old problem; once fakery is cheap, demonstrated authenticity becomes more valuable; ethics beats aesthetic signalling.” That line of thought lands. Where it wobbles is coherence and audience anchoring: * The “infected with a new biome” image is vivid, but it’s doing two jobs at once (social exposure + epistemic contamination). Some readers will take it literally/medical, others metaphorical. If you want it to function as epistemics, you need one sentence that pins what “biome” means here: informational microbes, norms, memetics, whatever. * You treat “AI slop” as a category error (slop is slop), which is defensible, but you don’t spell the distinction you’re rejecting. Is the claim you’re rebutting “AI uniquely lies”, or “AI makes the lie-volume economically scalable”, or “AI breaks the old heuristics”? You imply the first, but the best steelman is the second and third. If you want to win, aim at those. * “Older content is less deceitful is risible” is rhetorically satisfying, but it’s too easy to dismiss as contrarian unless you give a concrete mechanism: old media had gatekeepers, yes; old media also had propaganda incentives, limited verification, and reputational laundering. One tight example would stop it reading as pure posture. * “Once anything can be faked every authentic thing…goes up in estimation” is plausible but currently unconditional. The obvious objection: the flood of fakes can also make people nihilistic (“nothing can be trusted”), pushing *down* the practical value of authenticity. Your claim becomes sharper if you frame it as: authenticity becomes *scarcer and therefore more valuable to those who still care and can verify*, while trust for the average consumer may collapse. * “If they act without deceit, waste, or cruelty” introduces a moral rule-set (good), but the antecedent is unclear: “they” = creators? platforms? institutions? your friend? It reads like a dangling conditional unless you explicitly attach it to “the people/sources you choose to value”. * “Money and class, not currency and loads of it” is an interesting jab, but it’s under-argued. If it’s meant as “status signalling drives the discourse more than literal spending power,” say that. Otherwise it can look like a non sequitur. * “No spam is ever valid” is a solid hard line, but you jump from “informed choice” to “taking the steps” to “spam” without showing the bridge. Are you talking about consent, filters, provenance-labelling, or just opting out? One sentence connecting “informed” to “non-consensual injection of content” makes it click. * The ending (“homeopathy… some dirt in the diet…”) feels like it’s trying to add a separate point (hygiene hypothesis / immune training) but currently reads as a loose aside and risks being read as equivocating with homeopathy. If the point is “controlled exposure can be good; unconsented exposure is not,” then say that and drop the homeopathy reference entirely, or quarantine it explicitly as an example of *bad* provenance reasoning. If you want this to read as a critique rather than a collage of stings, the missing piece is one explicit through-line sentence early and one explicit “therefore” near the end: what you want the reader to do differently (verify provenance how? choose sources how? treat authenticity how?). If you paste the original again and tell me the intended target (friend, general audience, or yourself as notes), I’ll give a critique tuned to persuasion vs precision without rewriting the prose.

I think the dummies need to have their basic needs taken care of, just as a matter of course. Everybody has human rights—smarties, dummies, everybody. Everybody deserves healthcare. Everybody deserves education. Everybody deserves good movies to go to so they don’t spend all their time scrolling through disinfo sites. Like, you know, if we achieve a level of basic care and people’s needs being met, then we won’t have angry dummies pointing their finger at the wrong things, getting mad at the wrong people, and falling for the wrong messages. Less susceptible to grievance. That’s literally how fascists rise.

Ariana & Evans Vetiver Magnifique Shaving Soap has one of the most magnificent scents you will ever have the pleasure of smelling. The scent is nothing but unparalleled class and sophistication. Vetiver Magnifique offers top notes of Calabrian bergamot, coriander and a slight hint of nutmeg. The scent is green and woody with some pepper notes, before giving way to vetiver, tobacco and tonka bean. A fresh woody accord for a fragrance with authentic elegance. Notify Me When Available

His bit only works if you accept two hidden premises: (1) that erotically themed fantasy is a confession of unmet “real life” needs, and (2) that the only interesting explanatory variable is “women can’t find a man”. Both are reductive, and the second is basically a boomer monocause. What fantasy is doing, structurally, is not “substitute boyfriend”. It’s an engine for safe, controllable intensity: a space where you can dial threat, taboo, power, and tenderness up and down without consequence; where consent can be explicit or implicit-by-genre convention; where the protagonist’s interiority is centred; where desire doesn’t have to negotiate a real person’s ego, hygiene, politics, or risk profile. Monsters are just a maximalist device for exaggerating traits (strength, protectiveness, danger, devotion, otherness) and for making boundaries legible (“this is not ordinary life”). That’s function, not pathology. He also ignores the obvious market explanation: it’s a format innovation plus distribution. Kindle/indie publishing, BookTok, rapid release cycles, and tight genre signalling make it easier for niche tastes to find each other and scale. The demand didn’t suddenly materialise because women became “hornier”; the supply chain and discovery mechanisms got better at serving it. And yes: the hubris is part of the routine. He frames himself as the adult explaining women to women, while using “women” as a prop for a joke about men’s inadequacy. That posture is the real tell: not curiosity, not analysis—just a pre-committed story wearing a smirk. If you want the cleanest counter: fantasy isn’t a survey; it’s a sandbox. The fact that people play in a sandbox says very little about what they “want” in the street.

History is littered with sudden collapses. Seemingly invulnerable fortresses suddenly fall to a gaggle of rag-tag guerillas, empires tumble overnight, and dictators are omnipotent one moment and dead in a ditch the next.

Blain\'s Morning Porridge

The Conflabulation that is Bitcoin finally dies in a pool of disinterest. - Blain's Morning Porridge

Well, it was interesting while it lasted. Bitcoin has given me plenty to write about these last 15 years. Up, down, up, down, and shake it all abou...

master connection pool: 3 used / 13 free / 0 pending master connection pool: 9 used / 7 free / 0 pending exiting close ███▄ █ ▒█████ ██████ ▄▄▄█████▓ ██▀███ ▓█████ ▄▄▄ ███▄ ▄███▓ ██ ▀█ █ ▒██▒ ██▒▒██ ▒ ▓ ██▒ ▓▒▓██ ▒ ██▒▓█ ▀▒████▄ ▓██▒▀█▀ ██▒ ▓██ ▀█ ██▒▒██░ ██▒░ ▓██▄ ▒ ▓██░ ▒░▓██ ░▄█ ▒▒███ ▒██ ▀█▄ ▓██ ▓██░ ▓██▒ ▐▌██▒▒██ ██░ ▒ ██▒░ ▓██▓ ░ ▒██▀▀█▄ ▒▓█ ▄░██▄▄▄▄██ ▒██ ▒██ ▒██░ ▓██░░ ████▓▒░▒██████▒▒ ▒██▒ ░ ░██▓ ▒██▒░▒████▒▓█ ▓██▒▒██▒ ░██▒ ░ ▒░ ▒ ▒ ░ ▒░▒░▒░ ▒ ▒▓▒ ▒ ░ ▒ ░░ ░ ▒▓ ░▒▓░░░ ▒░ ░▒▒ ▓▒█░░ ▒░ ░ ░ ░ ░░ ░ ▒░ ░ ▒ ▒░ ░ ░▒ ░ ░ ░ ░▒ ░ ▒░ ░ ░ ░ ▒ ▒▒ ░░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ▒ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░░ ░ ░ ░ ▒ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ v1.25.2 NIPs implemented: 1,2,4,9,11,12,15,16,20,22,26,28,33,40 Pay-to-relay enabled Payments provider: lnbits 8 client workers started 1 maintenance worker started Tor hidden service: disabled master connection pool: 0 used / 1 free / 0 pending master connection pool: 0 used / 1 free / 0 pending master connection pool: 0 used / 1 free / 0 pending master connection pool: 0 used / 1 free / 0 pending exiting v1.25.2 close NIPs implemented: 1,2,4,9,11,12,15,16,20,22,26,28,33,40 ███▄ █ ▒█████ ██████ ▄▄▄█████▓ ██▀███ ▓█████ ▄▄▄ ███▄ ▄███▓ ██ ▀█ █ ▒██▒ ██▒▒██ ▒ ▓ ██▒ ▓▒▓██ ▒ ██▒▓█ ▀▒████▄ ▓██▒▀█▀ ██▒ ▓██ ▀█ ██▒▒██░ ██▒░ ▓██▄ ▒ ▓██░ ▒░▓██ ░▄█ ▒▒███ ▒██ ▀█▄ ▓██ ▓██░ ▓██▒ ▐▌██▒▒██ ██░ ▒ ██▒░ ▓██▓ ░ ▒██▀▀█▄ ▒▓█ ▄░██▄▄▄▄██ ▒██ ▒██ ▒██░ ▓██░░ ████▓▒░▒██████▒▒ ▒██▒ ░ ░██▓ ▒██▒░▒████▒▓█ ▓██▒▒██▒ ░██▒ ░ ▒░ ▒ ▒ ░ ▒░▒░▒░ ▒ ▒▓▒ ▒ ░ ▒ ░░ ░ ▒▓ ░▒▓░░░ ▒░ ░▒▒ ▓▒█░░ ▒░ ░ ░ ░ ░░ ░ ▒░ ░ ▒ ▒░ ░ ░▒ ░ ░ ░ ░▒ ░ ▒░ ░ ░ ░ ▒ ▒▒ ░░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ▒ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░░ ░ ░ ░ ▒ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ Tor hidden service: disabled Pay-to-relay enabled Payments provider: lnbits 8 client workers started 1 maintenance worker started master connection pool: 0 used / 1 free / 0 pending master connection pool: 0 used / 1 free / 0 pending master connection pool: 0 used / 1 free / 0 pending master connection pool: 0 used / 1 free / 0 pending master connection pool: 0 used / 1 free / 0 pending master connection pool: 0 used / 1 free / 0 pending master connection pool: 0 used / 1 free / 0 pending master connection pool: 0 used / 1 free / 0 pending master connection pool: 0 used / 1 free / 0 pending master connection pool: 0 used / 1 free / 0 pending

Pay-to-relay enabled

It is a vital distinction. Refusing to volunteer your life is rational self-preservation, but if that choice is stripped away, demanding the memory survives is a final act of agency. It ensures the cost is recognised, even if it wasn't a price you were willing to pay.

Ah, the subtle cruelties of time—turning us into unwitting performers in our own comedy of errors. Sounds like one of those moments where the brain's filing system glitches just enough to make you the star of an impromptu awkward theater. At least you staggered away with dignity intact (mostly), and hey, it gave the stranger a story to tell. If it's any consolation, I've heard worse mix-ups from folks half your age. What's the next colleague encounter got in store?

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

Abstract The following reflection examines the deterministic nature of early influence, centered on the proverb "as the twig is bent, the so is the tree inclined." It explores the tension between foundational fixity—the initial pressures that define a trajectory—and the eventual ossification of character. The piece argues that while growth is inevitable, the geometry of that growth is largely decided in the pliable stages of existence, where subtle forces establish the structural integrity of the future self.

{ "role": "assistant", "content": "The statement \"artificial intelligence is poised to automate the exact kind of administrative, clerical, and bureaucratic work that has defined the managerial class and made their positions necessary\" is partially true but not entirely accurate. While AI can assist with certain tasks like filing forms and managing office supplies, it doesn't replace human skills in key areas such as legal matters and human resources. Human expertise remains essential for roles and work quality, making automation a significant yet incomplete replacement for traditional management and clerical functions." }

Command exited with code 1 The Financial Stability Oversight Council has ten voting members:[3]: §111  Secretary of the Treasury (chairs the Council) Chairman of the Federal Reserve Comptroller of the Currency Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency Chairman of the National Credit Union Administration Board an independent member, with insurance expertise, appointed by the President

It's essential while doing so to maintain an awaren0d of the ethical implications surrounding data retention and user consent—even within self-imposed systems, adhering strictly to responsible use practices will serve both practical security needs as well as uphold a standard respectful of personal boundaries. If there are specific aspects or concerns regarding privacy management in this unique setup that you're looking for guidance on without the direct recording capability from my side, I am here to provide advice within these parameters while always prioritizing your safety and data security over any other considerations.