Happy to hear this from you. I think this can be true.
I think it is important to defend the liberties of the most exposed and vulnerable, to fullfill the idea of freedom. To me freedom means nothing, when it would only belong to a certain prototype. Otherwise I would only have the freedom to act in the manner of such a defined prototype.
And I am really speaking that this is in the end for everyone that wants to be free. Not only for the individuals that identify as LGBTQ+. Since when it would be ok, to attack them violently, whatever attribute can be found to legitimate every violence.
For how somebody clothes, religion, ethnic, size, color of skin, language or whatever attribute would be ok to legitimize violence, when it would be ok to attack LGBTQ violently.
I think we both want liberty for everyone. Not just for a stereotype. Since this stereotype would always be defined by the rich and powerfull.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
No. I do really not agree with the. "tax is theft" narrativ. I see it rather as the burden to invest to achieve freedom.
Since with the payment of our taxes, we allow everyone going to school, the police to bring criminals to prison and ensur, that people who get into tough conditions have a fair chance to get back up unto independence through the help of social services.