Thread - Nostr Hypermedia

Yes, but let me just say that many other edit NIP proposals also share the name "nip37" so we might be confusing some readers. I guess instead of the warning text talking about NIP-37 the popup confirmation could say something like: "This may cause existing comments and reactions to this note to disappear in some clients. Read more."

↑ Parent

Replies (2)

fiatjaf _@fiatjaf.com 1 year ago

I am not sure if I like the tweaked-delete-and-replace flow more or if I prefer the annotations-with-benefits spec for small typo fixes (this one:

GitHub

Feature Tracker: Edits · Issue #1569 · nostr-protocol/nips

Just a list of PRs that propose some version of note editing: #1087 #1088 #1089 #1090 #1091 #1556 #1565 Also relevant: #1510 #1540

The second would have to enforce some limits to the amount of characters replaced in order to be decent.

1 replies ↓

SwBratcher swb@primal.net 1 year ago

Honing my placeholder text makes sense. Whatever goes there that will manage the behavior expectation for the user, and let even a rookie know how the network will react to their action. I like that the link out to more info is a great opportunity to help people coming from centralized systems understand how a Nostr wild west client on relays will behave with their usage.