If you paid per token instead of a monthly plan you probably wouldn't waste so much time building nonsense nobody will use
Login to reply
Replies (21)
u.u
Agree. But its great for learning...
Same thing applies to OpenSats grants. π€£π€£π€£π€£
Also its a trap
Do you think people still try to vibe code facebook?
I just try to build something that I would found useful. Thatβs one use right there

Jokes on me. I pay for both π«
FREN IM BUILDING AGAIN
sounds more like puzz i presume lOlz
How would you know? You tried to hire himπ€π₯΄
Yes, I only pay per token and build tech so that other Bitcoiners can also easily pay per token via @routstr. π§‘
This whole "token limits, 5 hour limits, weekly limits, resets and getting angry at limit decreases" is all so foreign to me. I do think a lot before spending my time and sats on projects. Life is good.
Better than sucking dick for cheeseburgers π
Now you're just being mean π Given that I'm not some kind of token Effective Altuist (and let's be honest, none of us are), I love the fact that I can pay my monthly sub and build, learn, entertain myself, and end up with some stuff that I find to be honestly useful, all without ending up with a with a bunch of clutter (like when I use wood, metal, or electrical components), or overthinking every prompt/incremental expense.
When you spend bitcoin on AI, it enforces anti slop
View quoted note →
there is a red team
π€·ββοΈ I'm kinda just not a fan of any of those guys.
Lool
I have a $20 Claude sub and still pay per token on OC to do most of the work. I spend less on tokens than the Claude plan and I never hit a usage wall. I still use Claude opus for checking its work and writing good plans but just that usually consumes the 5hr limit.
ππ
Ya the subscriptions are pure fiat!!