Would a better funding model be something like an "assurance contract"? I.e. depending on how many people donate / sign on, that allows for X amounts of attendees...
A few different tiers could gate the size of the venue, overflow could support "charity" tickets, etc....?
Login to reply
Replies (2)
I mean I'd imagine other ETH conferences have experimented with a "conference DAO"...
The retroactive funding was more for future years, when it is established. For a start, it is necessary to count on donations, especially from organizations - and they need a bigger and more comprehensive vision to give money.
So making some tiers with the number of participants and different venue sizes doesn't make much sense to me, it will only complicate everything