I'd say it depends on what you're building. Some applications are more complex than others and AI does well depending on the overall complexit. That said, are you using Claude Opus 4.5? It's expensive, but it's a pure win in my opinion.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
Paid in sats for your basic model for most of it. Realized I was spending too many sats and switched to the OpenAI account. GPT 4.1 really made a mess of things but 5.1 was certainly much better. 4.1 would just delete entire chunks of functions and replace them with comments saying not to change this part ๐
Ought to be possible to improve the models you'd think, but not without limit. Wonder what those limits will turn out to be.
Some things that I'd like in Shakespeare in the first blog post there [
].
Mostly better management of the chat context. Able to pull back old ones, and delete chunks from them where the robot goes astray or is too verbose and fill up the context window.

Exocortex Blog
Vibe Coding - Exocortex Blog
A review of Shakespeare.diy for vibe coding
Okay! Thanks for th feedback. I'll take a look.