Progress is not represented in cultures that send their women to enforce their rules. There's nothing wrong with women fighting. I'm also not saying, women aren't allowed to do these things. I'm making an observation that a society that sends their women to enforce their rules is not a society in progress. It's a society in regress. To your last point, men are physically stronger than women in almost all cases. That's just biological fact. There are more than enough men to fill all the roles of military and police. The only reason to hire a woman for these positions is because they want to and can achieve what the men can do. That's not the case t all for 99% of women hired for these roles. A society in progress hails and protects their women. Men and women are not equal but neither are wholly better than one another. We have different strengths. Don't sit here and argue with me that women can do everything men can do. That's what's dillusional. They can't. Men also cannot do everything that women can do. We will start to progress when we structure culture to play to our strengths, not our weakness.

Replies (6)

Automatically excluding people from certain roles without even evaluating their skill or desire to do that role isn't progress by any standard I know of. I know if I need the police I'd sure rather have @CrisCyborg show up to protect me than your sexist ass.
And I never once suggested that... I suppose you're too fueled with anger to appropriately comprehend my comments. I am not sexist. Go ahead ask. Ask me if I think a woman should be allowed to protect and serve. My answer is yes. If she can meet the same standards as the men are held to on that force. (The mens standards need to be raised too. Way too many overweight cops) You would know that if you bothered to actually comprehend what I wrote instead of trying to white knight all over the place. @CrisCyborg would be one hell of a cop. Like RoboCop. But you're using an extreme example clearly to justify your point. "Look cris can do it, so any woman can of they wanted to." No. No they couldn't.
Ironically, in a future where proof of work becomes a bigger factor in power projection, I suspect women will start to play a larger role in the defense of humanity. Men and women cannot physically detain suspects equally. But women can sure as hell code just as good as the men. Hell they're probably better at organizing our mess. There's a lot of kick ass female developers out there. @npub1m4ny...c2jl @arkinox
OceanSlim's avatar OceanSlim
Progress is not represented in cultures that send their women to enforce their rules. There's nothing wrong with women fighting. I'm also not saying, women aren't allowed to do these things. I'm making an observation that a society that sends their women to enforce their rules is not a society in progress. It's a society in regress. To your last point, men are physically stronger than women in almost all cases. That's just biological fact. There are more than enough men to fill all the roles of military and police. The only reason to hire a woman for these positions is because they want to and can achieve what the men can do. That's not the case t all for 99% of women hired for these roles. A society in progress hails and protects their women. Men and women are not equal but neither are wholly better than one another. We have different strengths. Don't sit here and argue with me that women can do everything men can do. That's what's dillusional. They can't. Men also cannot do everything that women can do. We will start to progress when we structure culture to play to our strengths, not our weakness.
View quoted note →