Core v30 vs. knots discussion?
Nobody cares about fallacies. Nobody cares about solid argumentation.
Great.
Drama is way better of course.
Login to reply
Replies (6)
Keep L1 transactions, sidechain the wizards
Not that I agree with them, but core devs made the better arguments. All I heard from knots supporters was accusations.
That's right. So far the only valid argument I've heard is network efficiency, but that isn't absolute.
What does 'keep' mean in that sentence Sai?
My bad if that was vague I was stuck in js all day.
I just feel like btc should stay how satoshi made it, for final transactions that transfer value derived from proof of work with no worries of double spend on an immutable ledger….
And that inscribing other data should be separate from that, ordinals, inscriptions…. the only reason they are being assigned a value is because they’re forcing themselves into the blockchain… where’s the new blockchain just for encoding your jpeg? Oh that’s right there isn’t one, because it would be worthless.
Maybe, idk I’d be open to debate, but a side chain or layer could give those who wish to do those type of “transactions” could have their own ecosystem while still binding themselves to a unit of value, without interfering with actual bitcoin transactions? Or am I just dumb