Shall the UXTO cap be free and let inflate the sat supply? Shall the whole world library and digital media be stored (inscribed) in the SSDs of each regular Bitcoin nodes? If you are really for those values named before, then you would agree, regular Bitcoin node operators have a legit right to self defense; since the ones of your kind are performing aggression; and aggression on my property and property of those who are providing resources without compensation.

Inscriptions have no bearing on sat supply. Bitcoin full node operators implicitly agree on potential blockchain storage space growing at about 200GB annually. Similar on the UTXO set being allowed to grow which isnt a new problem caused by inscriptions. As to libraries storing content, Id welcome it. Such data would likely be an improvement over whats there now. Ultimately people pay fees for blockspace, not for every node. Node operators run nodes for their own benefit, and indirectly support other node operators and further decentralization. I run multiple full nodes and pruned nodes so im well aware of the resource issues and appropriately planning to migrate systems as needed and consider decommisioning others. I find it is essential to adapt to the changing world to survive and thrive.