Suspicion confirmed: Hoppe's 'Argumentation Ethics' is analogous to VanTil's presuppositional apologetics.
nostr:nevent1qqs097fnqpvzt5dqtrta9knwxsd0995mky0vj3qm000nxup07ul7wxcpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtczyrlmk8zhfrunley8dz6f8dq30d4ywak7xj32u7xlkdelapu52yzkqqcyqqqqqqguw6dz2
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Right. The truth of one side must be presupposed in order to even proceed--and by the very act of proceeding against it, all opposition is thereby refuted.
VanTil used a similar argument -- I believe a form of transcendental argumentation, or the 'synthetic a priori' -- to require the truth of Christian theism to even predicate...
It's a fantastic argument.