This quote from you is very troubling.
“Why do you think it’s ok to spread his face around?”
Imagine a politician saying this about a potential opponent, a ceo saying this about a journalist investigating his business practices, a dictator discussing an individual that the people deem a martyr.
I suggest you rethink the way you convey your feelings to content you dislike. Your initial comment was a mask off moment. You are the people we are fighting against.
No censorship.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
I can’t stop him from posting Andrew Tate content all I can do is stop listening. I simply wanted to understand his reasoning before deciding whether to do that.
“No censorship” doesn’t mean we should spread every piece of bad or misleading information without consequences. You’re free to say whatever you want, but others are equally free to call it out, criticize it, or stop engaging with it. That’s how free discourse works.
There’s no world where you get to say things without others reacting and on Nostr especially, since here we choose the people we interact with, not some algorithm.
If anything, posting Andrew Tate is the real “mask-off” moment. And thinking that asking for an explanation equals censorship is even more revealing.
It’s also funny how you keep making things up first claiming I was mad (I wasn’t; otherwise I’d have unfollowed him and said it outright), and now suggesting I want to censor people. Neither is true.
So, as I asked him, I’ll ask you too: before I make up my mind about you, why do you think it’s ok to just invent things about other people’s emotions or intentions?