At some point though we have to acknowledge that nostr doesn't scale for the intended use case. It's cool, but it doesn't scale. So the only fair comparison is between Nostr and other architectures that are also innovative but also can't theoretically scale. If SSB were still around it'd be a fair comparison. I'm sure there are some others. Pubky, Keet and such are a class that *can* theoretically scale. The chance that they will isn't all that high in light of the history of the internet in general, but there are no fundamental technical barriers preventing scale (whereas with Nostr there are). That said not being able to scale is not a bad thing. Nostr architecture could form the basis of many little worlds that don't connect to form a big world but still makes Nostr a useful contribution to the web.

Replies (1)

see, you get it wrong from the start we don't want it to scale. we don't want to have a global. we want to have our communities and a transitory blur between them that lets people if they sit too far on the edge and might want to be in another, move to it. you can't do that if you assume from the outset that it has to be a global consensus. anyway. my text just now, here, is far less like an AI written text than yours. but a lot of people have adopted writing patterns that resemble the AI. i'm just pointing out that your thought processes are constrained.