Maybe, but there have been so many debunkings of the debunkings that the only way to know for sure is to be the investigator yourself. The debunkings are extra suspect because they seem to only come from one side. Since the ballot is secret, its unverifiable, and any claims of verification of any sort amounts to trusting an authority, which is obviously biased or at least a central point to corrupt, and any further oversight simply adds steps to the same problem, which is "trust me bro." IMO votes can't be secret. I know there's reasons for the ballot being secret, and they're good reasons, but they don't outweigh the need for verification. Luckily, with asymmetric cryptography, we can have both secrecy and verification - but it will never be implemented, and every day that its not implemented is simply more proof that its all fake.