And IMO the data shouldn't come from entrepreneurs, it should come from the market. Until a product is launched, it is just an experiment. Let the entrepreneurs experiment and build a market and let that speak for why the nodes should change.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
entrepreneurs are a large part of the market.
Entrepreneurs in plural yes. Not in singular. Entrepreneurs in plural don't typically band together to demand one feature (sometimes they do and it gets done, and sometimes they lose like with RBF)... For this case, I don't see a bunch of people advertising all the different use cases that all these different entrepreneurs will enable with this change and defending it.
Heck I don't even see people promoting citrea and what it can do. I hear more about covenant implementations.
Also, entrepreneurs that are waiting for a change in a decentralised system or who are willing to cause harm instead are not exactly who the core team and the users are supposed to bend over for.
Fortunately users are self serving, and I'm bullish on people informing themselves, having an opinion and doing what they think is best for themselves, and this change is not an "end of the world" type thing, but it is ruining reputations the way it is rolling out and the way certain devs are behaving.