Calling God’s word “moot” misuses the term, because moot means "no longer relevant or operative due to changed circumstances," which Scripture explicitly denies. If God’s word were actually moot, Christ’s rebuke would be incoherent, because there would be nothing left to violate or judge by. The passage condemns tradition overriding obedience, not tradition overriding divine authority. Claiming God’s word is moot while appealing to it as judgment-bearing authority is internally contradictory. God’s word is never moot; people render themselves disobedient to it. Learn English. Use it properly. Then quip.

Also regarding the scripture Mark 7:13 does not say God’s word ceases to bind, exist, or carry authority. It says human tradition nullifies obedience to it in practice. The Greek verb there means to invalidate by action, not to abolish or cancel ontologically. The agency in the verse is human, not divine, and the failure belongs to people, not to the word of God. I.e., "moot" is absolutely the wrong word.