words can have more than one definition as I'm sure you are aware being a fucking obvious genius and all...
First, get it right, nigger, and don't you fucking slander me. I didnt "call G_D's word "moot" you fucking misframing cocksucker - whatever that even means. I said that Social Security RENDERS G_d's Word moot. and thats exactly what it does. Particularly in a collective sense for a so-called "Christian" nation that accepts this "thievery of one's neighbor" - not to mention unborn grandchildren for fucks sake.
To RENDER MOOT means, amongst other things, to make a point or a case WITHOUT PRACTICAL SIGNIFICANCE. did you catch that!?
To render something without practical significance.
The welfare state, as manifest through government franchise contracts, Social Security being the gorilla, renders G_d's word without practical significance relative to, for one, the commandment to love your neighbor - you can't love your neighbor when you contract with the government to steal from him.
There are countless other biblical violations which such forbidden relations with government provoke and sustain.
And there are also countless, ENTIRELY PERTINENT consequences - the main one being that under such adhesion contracts , one LOSES THEIR GOD GIVEN RIGHTS! Like, WOW! Go figure ! Collective AND individual apparently...
These proxy stand-in dependencies for the Common Good Will, which is the manifest quality of any community which obeys the Law, are evil precisely because they render insignificant the PRACTICAL EFFECTS of those particular dictums of the Most High. Like, that, you know, we are to be caring for each other.
Looks like what really happened here is you are just some asshole looking for a fight while not having a fucking clue what you are talking about - and of course, no solution is proffered.
