the LLM thinks it's a bunch of generic waffle, btw, this was its initial output:
The article "Security Budget II: MM" discusses the importance of allocating sufficient resources to cybersecurity. Here's a summary of its key points:
**Premises:**
- Cybersecurity is critical for protecting digital assets and personal information.
- Underfunding security can lead to major vulnerabilities, breaches, and financial or reputational damage.
- Many organizations fail to prioritize security spending due to short-term thinking or lack of awareness.
**Conclusions:**
- A robust cybersecurity budget is essential to prevent attacks and mitigate risks.
- Organizations should invest in regular security assessments, employee training, and advanced defense technologies.
- Long-term investment in security pays off by reducing the likelihood and impact of cyber threats.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
this was practically my initial impression from skimming through the text and getting tired of its lack of focus or attempt to actually make a point.
it's waffle, i can't even begin to describe how utterly unfocused the text is as regards to a criticism of bitcoin's security