PV ☀️ followers 🤙 zap features 🤙 relay count 🤙 FAQ 🤙 Iris usernames ☀️ What's your take on the follower count? Should we remove it entirely? #[0] Your follower count on Iris may seem lower than on other clients. Iris rejects events from authors that your social network has not interacted with. You get way less spam and your follower count number is lower for the same reason. ⚡️⚡️⚡️ Thanks for all the comments to our requests for feature ideas and best practises for zapping. You can still jump in and share your brilliant ideas and concerns. #[1] What's the proper amount of relays? Iris account runs well between 7-13 active relays. ❓❓❓ Any questions❓ 👉 See the or use the search box for already answered questions. Get your iris .to / username if you haven't already. The shorter names go first. #[2]

Replies (10)

a2046z's avatar
a2046z 2 years ago
plausability and trust thru the amount of followers is failed. zap me if you agree
You should try to remove the followers count and see how it goes for a few weeks. I run a dozen of relays and it seems fine to me.
pam's avatar
pam 2 years ago
Def a lot to unpackage and to think abt, not just based on technical implications, but also principles and impact. I don’t have an answer but here are some thought processes : 1. It helps to keep track of who you follow / follows you - but this doesn’t have to public 2. It helps to show if the profile page you view indicates ‘follows you’ 3. It’s normal to do profile check before you follow. - Who they are, interest, communication behaviour (as it impacts your feed and notification). - On Twitter you see whom among those you follow, follows this person. This is good because you build your own tribe. - On Iris, you can hover over the colour badge and see the # instead. - Externally there is linkedin, Google search. As pretentious and grossed out linkedin is, often it builds trust and confidence (as opposed to if you are a ‘nobody’) However, crowd persuasion can also be dangerous - You fuel in narcissism of a populist - You fuel in the need to want to be a populist - you also see this in leadership, religion, cults and it can be used for good and bad Are there benefits in being a populist ? - It’s gonna be harder to bully someone who has access to a large crowd. - You get to push a mission forward faster. - But once it becomes centralised controlled, it can get harmful For influencer, populist - Numbers and metrics sells. - As Nostr grows, content creation becomes crucial. I think there is just so to think abt - would be risky to come to a conclusion quickly. I also think #[3] would be the best to share with us on his thoughts between regular usage vs what influencers seek, whereby the latter can also be adapted for artist payments, commerce, crowdfunding etc
#Nostr shouldn’t try to imitate Twitter or Insta. This is the chance to rethink what’s important and what isn’t. If it’s just “decentralized Twitter” it will fail. It has to be something novel for the world. Automatic translation to your native language is much more important than follower count, for instance, because so many who can’t be on Twitter can be here.
I use follower count like a market price when determining if i should follow someone. If they have a lot of followers they probably have a lot of good content so i follow right away. If they have a low count i wait till i see more good post before following.
great note, iris. would it be better to measure the interactions with a nostr account instead of the contact list ? so, measure interactions last month or last week (sum of likes, replies, zaps and repost). in that case i would find that a much more signal compared.to follower count, and follow count can be dropped