Why is it better to lose the social cohesion of mistaken viewpoints? What tangible benefits do you receive?
Also, a man who lived through Covid must acknowledge that the cultish agreement for the sake of belonging still exists under the guise of Science.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
oh I argue with those people too
it's okay to have smaller, more fractured groups that identify by niche interests.
smaller groups that compete or cooperate on the basis of *the effectiveness of their ideas* is a better social outcome than large groups driven by herd mentality.
but this is maximally effective if people are actually thinking critically and creating views that map to their observations.
I think to have success with changing these people's minds, one would need to offer a framing of tangible benefits. Like for instance if they were to attempt navigating the ocean by the stars.
since the benefits are primarily social
as you pointed out
I think that's unlikely to be effective.
like covid hysteria, it's mostly just flag waving and group identification.