I get what you’re saying, and you’re not wrong about the world being bigger than the U.S. The key thing though isn’t population, it’s who controls the money flows. The data matters not because it reflects reality, but because the largest pools of capital trade off it. Funds, banks, pensions, and institutions that control global liquidity are using U.S. data as a sentiment and positioning tool, not as truth. That’s why it moves markets. We don’t use the data because we “believe” it. We use it to understand how capital is being guided and manipulated in the short term. Gold and metals reacting right now isn’t about faith in numbers, it’s about loss of faith in money itself. Data doesn’t move markets. Power does. Data just gives it cover.

Replies (2)

I understand what you're saying but most people don't even own Bitcoin. Best case scenario they own a couple of BTC ETF certificates. The US is also - still - not THE major holder of Bitcoin. Yes, they bought up a lot of the supply to make it disappear in vaults (so much for mass-adoption but that's a different topic) but the US economy is still not a driving factor behind Bitcoin's value discovery. That's just not the case.
🤔 From 2024 to 2025, the U.S. had a massive impact on Bitcoin’s price discovery. The approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in early 2024 brought major capital inflows, and let's not forget Bitcoin’s roots and ecosystem are deeply intertwined with the U.S. market. From institutional adoption to regulatory moves, the U.S. is driving the narrative. So, claiming the U.S. has minimal impact? That’s overlooking the core of Bitcoin’s influence. 😉 Who, then, has more influence than the U.S. than?