and yes, she is a very intelligent lady, and very confident about her intelligence, and performs well at carrying that
i also write a lot off the top of my head, so much so that i get accused occasionally of being an AI (even though i post photos of my ortholinear mech keyboard) - back in the old days people would say "you're on meth" and occasionally that was true
people with high intelligence and low impulse control have a lot of audacity at argumentation, even when they have got something wrong, and attacking that as a personality flaw does not endear you to them, nor does it achieve the ostensible goal of correcting their inaccurate models
and i'm definitely of the opinion that atheism is a wrong model, this universe has rigid laws and you have to at minimum agree that the entire edifice of science rests upon the foundation of this fixity of the laws, even if maybe some of the apparent constants fluctuate the laws that they regulate do not
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Well she sure carries herself as if she's some sort of nostr celebrity. Especially the "doesn't take criticism well / quick to mute" aspect.
At no point did I attack her personality. The closest I came to something resembling an insult was to say I don't understand moderate religious people, and that I understand fanatics better.
And that was in the context of psychic profits. Namely: if there is an endless wealth of psychic profit available to the believer, and those profits are unbelievably strong (both immediately and literally forever after) why does one ever defer on maximizing those profits?
I know you think atheism is a wrong model. That's fine.