It was also a process of governance discovery.
Big blockers really wanted there to be a simple process for making consensus changes and we're banking upon miners being the Schelling point for consensus.
Unfortunately for them, crypto anarchy ain't that simple.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
True
ANY process for making changes would be better than just ossification through retardation
fun fact, governance happens anyway.
it's better if it's public and determined, than private and behind closed doors.
Bitcoin is not governable and that's the whole point. Game theory plays out. Everybody is part of the game but nobody controls the outcome. If that were not true, it would just be fiat with extra steps.