Not bad points, but feels far afield.. this conversation started off with my worry that Primal is harming decentralization, while other clients that are nearly identical to use (like Damus) are not guilt of this. And your response was "but look at the layouts of these screens - one is basically unusable".
I don't see the connection between technically buried config options in Core which are difficult for a non-technical person to figure out and meaningfully change their mempool and the potentially the protocol itself, and the minor differences in layout and element sizes between nostr clients.
Your argument really loses the thread because Primal ("the pretty one") is the one that has the sneaky, hidden centralizing features that the average non-technical user doesn't understand - the corollary to Core developers being paid to introduce attack surfaces in your argument.
