"iT's eXaCtLy tHe sAmE aS tHe rEd bLuE gAmE tHeOrY!!!" yeah, sure it is, IF choosing red also signals your consent to on demand anal probes and surveillance.
It sets a dangerous precedent for random governance and disabling/limiting privacy features, limiting bitcoin based smart contracts and future impulsive chain splits/forks. All in an attempt to limit spam that will still be possible and has been possible for ages via many different mechanisms.
If you still don't get it, justify the 55% "consensus" threshold.
This smells a lot more like a shitcoiner motivated attack than a purist "bitcoin is solely money" principled stand. Bitcoin Script was there from the very beginning and taproot has been in the works for ages.
You want a better bitcoin than what is being maintained by core for over a decade? Chose from one of the 50 million shitcoins or roll your own. Reducing the "consensus" threshold proves this is a contentious attack against real consensus by definition and is against the well established bitcoin ethos.
Retards are here to "fix" bitcoin. Enjoy your hastily implemented minority fork and uniting with your malcontent comrades in the BCH and BSV crowds.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Your entire statement can be summed up as "shitcoiner projection"
Especially the part about BCH and BSV
Core are the ones that removed the data cap.
Your pedophile spam coin is the new BSV.
You're the ones trying to turn Btc into media hosting instead of transaction data
Try harder shit-lib.