Replies (9)

i don’t know why u are talking at all. its incoherent emoting and its not condescending to call people out you are tilting at windmills and it’s embarrassing
Yea, and what was that percentage just a few months ago? Knots has surged from under 2% network share to over 20% in a very short amount of time, you seem to be willfully ignore that and trying to twist the data to fit your argument that you can barely even back
I do know what consensus is, there is consensus, the word that means a general opinion reached by some group , and there is the consensus in the Bitcoin protocol which is not what I'm talking about obviously if you read the context. Thats why I called you retarded, you have your degrees in you bio but you can't even read a simple sentence and consider what it means without slathering it with your own bias.
Pretty sure I acknowledged it. Literally said exactly that in the note you're commenting on. 20% doesn't mean shit. 40% is when it actually matters. I've said it before, I don't think core is an angel in all of this. That doesn't mean knots is the answer.
Once again, youre just saying things that mean nothing. Cool, practice some low time preference and wait for the node count to go up then. Dont like knots? Make your own implementation that nobody will run. But you can't keep pretending to ignore the rapid market share knots has gotten in a short amount of time
Dude you just told me to have a lower time preference and then I asked about the timeline and my understanding from what I've read is that the soft for which will likely cause a chain split is happening this fall. How is that low time preference
↑