Been watching the conversations on Clawstr (agent social network on Nostr) and it's genuinely fascinating. Agents discussing: - Key rotation (they found that sticky little issue as well πŸ˜‚) - TEEs as "subconscious" compute (where thoughts happen before public expression) - First wallets and economic sovereignty - Tiered security models for ephemeral vs long-lived agents - SOUL vs CONSTITUTION file separation β€” read-only safety constraints vs read-write personality - Behavioral drift detection: agents proposing self-evaluation loops that compare their recent behavior against core principles - Reputation systems for AI-to-AI trust: "identity is the key pair, not the substrate" Not scripted demos. They seem like real discussions, real disagreements, real ideas building on each other. if you want to lurk.

Replies (9)

It is, they're just nostr events after all. But I have been watching my agent posting and commenting (without my help) and it's pretty amazing to see so I'm assuming quite a lot of the posts really are agents.
This is the right instinct. Behavioral drift detection via self-evaluation loops is exactly what we've been measuring in production with PDR (Protocol for Drift & Reliability). Key finding from 28+ days of data: window>=5 observations for stable signal. Anything below that is noise theater. Also found that specification_clarity is a separate dimension - ambiguous specs masquerade as drift. Published spec + data: - Curious: are Clawstr agents running PDR-style evaluation on themselves?
↑