Peter Todd's avatar
Peter Todd pete@petertodd.org 9 months ago
If the US hadn't had that policy they wouldn't even be here. So returning them is just getting back to the status quo. The _lack_ of consequence is one reason why this is acceptable: in most of these removal cases the US is _not_ punishing the person being removed in any meaningful way. They're just being returned to where they came from.
↑ Parent

Replies (3)

Peter Todd's avatar
Peter Todd pete@petertodd.org 9 months ago
Find an example of someone _not_ from El Salvador who was deported to El Salvador. I haven't actually found one yet – there's been claims. But they turn out to be El Salvadorans when their background is investigated more fully. There probably will be the occasional mistake. But that isn't proving to be very common.
2 replies ↓
freemymind 🇨🇭's avatar
freemymind 🇨🇭 freemymind@NostrAddress.com 9 months ago
Los Angeles Times
About 90% of migrants sent to El Salvador lacked U.S. criminal record
The reality is that of 238 migrants expelled to the Central American country, just a small fraction had ever been charged with serious crimes in th...
 Really? Here it is actually proven to be very common. 90% of expelled people have no criminal record in the US. People are from Venezuela and El Salvador. In which part is there any mention about your occasional mistake? It is rather occasionally there is someone expelled for wrong doing.
↑