Not really, they clearly focus on the official narrative being falsified and if the nano-thermite hypothesis is false that does not imply that a single girder pushed aside can cause free-fall of WTC7. You do agree the official narrative does not hold either right?

Of course the official narrative is false. I err towards the conclusions drawn by Judy Woods and such, which that revisionist account covers quite well. We will likely never know the exact events, but it is possible to build a relatively coherent picture if one can overcome certain beliefs or dissonances, like other forms of weaponry. For example, the distinct lack of specific seismic activity (p and s waves) suggests that it wasn't simply 'pulled' in the same way traditional demolitions are. So we have to seek alternative explanations.