I get the point, all personal attacks help nothing into the discussion. But Matthew Kratter provides arguments to prove that OP_RETURN limits have always worked and should not be removed. Bitcoin has to stay available to be run on any average computernfor years to come, and we cannot afford to use it to store images, videos, or anything that wastes storage, energy, and is not directly related to a transaction as per definition. There is proof that opening the protocol to handle arbitrary information degrades the network, see BitcoinSV, ETH… and practically any other coin that does not restrict it.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
and I don’t wanna degrade any other protocol or person. I don’t wanna say “everything other than btc is a shitcoin”, but the fact is there: I can NOT run ETH with my personal computer because of all the NFT, contracts, and etc. making the running of a node impossible without a high end supercomputer. Bitcoin decentralisation depends on the average person being able to run it to support the network