BIP110 has nothing to do with relay policy; is is a change to consensus rules. Core changed a relay policy. BIP110 is an attempt to change consensus. Core's move did not render any Bitcoin frozen. It is impossible to know in advance how much may be frozen by BIP110 through things like presigned transactions, common in inheritance schemes. To do nothing of value. Moving jpgs from opreturn into other fields in a transaction and bloating the utxo set while doing so isn't fixing anything. It's just a power trip from the sorts of people who have openly stated that they'd like unilateral control (mechanic) or would like to incorporate law enforcement measures into Bitcoin (Luke). You can't inhibit arbitrary data on chain, save through size limits, any more than you can prevent your enemies from using Bitcoin. Deal with it.