the primal team spent a ton of time working on the new wallet and the migration flow miljan refused to release until it was perfect full nostr integration, seamless onchain and lightning, no kyc massive win

Replies (16)

I'm skeptical that it'll stay KYC free, but people can always keep very little sats in and dump it. Might be a good idea to encourage that in the UI at least (if it doesn't already). Hopefully it works out. It at least doesn't seem any worse than when Strike was used.
I mean the sovereign answer is that they should run their own. The only difference with this solution is integration with another corporation handling some of the backend for wallet infra. Which is how products naturally scale. So I get it. I really do. It's easier and you're trying to get a product to market. A business is not an individual. It wouldn't make sense for them to make decisions like a sovriegn individual. But where is the line? When is is good/bad/indifferent to make certain tradeoffs? Is the decision not clear for primal to have Bitcoin in self custody for their Treasury? Maybe they should have ETF instead. It's the same thought process why a business would make that decision. The solution would be for primal to have their own lightning node. And it should be proportion in size to the users they expect to serve. That's really hard at scale though. I get it.
โ†‘