Reminder:
View quoted note →
Login to reply
Replies (16)
I've had that thought as well.
Saylor is a state actor.
If you were the USG and wanted to build a material bitcoin position with the following constraints, how would you do it?
Who wrote this? Just curious, I mostly agree. MSTR will become a stable coin issuing bitcoin backed bank and too big to fail and the government will nationalize it. Mandibles then bitcoin standard.
I’ve raised my 5% to 25% and believe that’s probably right. It was always inevitable anyway.
David Bailey has said the same
Seems likely
Just some yahoo on nostr who has thought about this too long
Better than a nostrich on yahoo.
That would make an interesting question of who is leading the dance? Saylor learns bitcoin, convinces government they need bitcoin, and says here is what I can do for you. Or, government knows they need bitcoin, educates Saylor, and says here’s what you need to do for us. 🤔
Probably something more akin to the ouija board planchette moving around while they giggle like children.
Mr big words makes me go to google to learn what a planchette is 🚁 😂
Words are powerful.
What person in government could keep this a secret? What’s the smallest team of people that could execute?
Secret?
lol
How do they prevent insiders from front-running?