"Knots could be one of those alternatives if Luke was more open to making it not just a Luke project."
If @Luke Dashjr did that then it could contribute to centralization of Bitcoin development.
It's good that knots is "just a Luke project" because we need more than two popular implementations, and I think Luke is setting an example that more devs need to express their opinions in open source code.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
It was never just a Luke project and I was never closed to more involvement. This quote is just FUD, @ODELL
You are the sole maintainer. Now, being maintainer doesn't mean you have full control because the code is open source. All the other knots devs could leave or fork off. Is that why you're saying it was never "just a Luke project?"
No, the Core maintainers also function as maintainers in Knots too. Saying I'm the sole maintainer because I roll the releases is like saying Gloria is the sole maintainer of Core 29.x.