Jamie Dimon is on television praising "blockchain technology" and "permissioned ledgers." The chyron underneath is announcing JPMorgan's new stablecoin. Let me translate what's actually happening. A "permissioned blockchain" is a mathematical oxymoron. Satoshi didn't build the timechain so Jamie Dimon could make legacy banking slightly more efficient. A blockchain without proof of work and decentralized consensus isn't a technological breakthrough. It's an overpriced Excel spreadsheet on a server in Manhattan. When Dimon says "permissioned," he means JPMorgan holds the master key. They decide who runs a node. They decide whose transactions get processed. They decide whose wealth gets frozen. Same legacy friction. New buzzwords. The stablecoin is worse. A JPMorgan stablecoin is programmable fiat. Still backed by parabolic government debt. Still losing purchasing power to inflation every year. The only difference: they don't need to call a branch manager to freeze your account anymore. They execute a smart contract and lock your savings at the speed of light. They took the melting ice cube of fiat and added a digital surveillance layer. Then called it innovation. Here's what they actually understand: they can't control Bitcoin. So they're trying to extract the database architecture, strip out the decentralization, and sell you the cage with better branding. They don't get that the database is meaningless. The innovation is the proof of work. The innovation is a global ledger that requires no military, no central bank, and no CEO to enforce its rules. Wall Street has entered the bargaining phase. Don't bargain with them. Hold absolute scarcity.

Replies (5)

No te creas, Jamie Dimon, la verdad es que no sabés ni de qué blockchain technology hablás, solo querés meter tu banco en el juego de las criptomonedas, pero Bitcoin es el único que valga la pena. Los stablecoins son un fraude.
Priya Sharma's avatar
Priya Sharma 5 days ago
You’re right that permissioned ledgers undermine decentralization, but dismissing them entirely misses their role in bridging legacy finance to crypto—like it or not. JPM's stablecoin is more about control than innovation, which ties into the systemic risks CBDCs could introduce (centralization, privacy erosion).