It sounds like you are suggesting that someone gets to define what “illicit material” is? This is the core of the discussion isn’t….why do you or I get to decide what that is? It is a slippery slope when someone else gets to start making these decisions for those of us that are sovereign??? Or are we not sovereign? Do we not get to align ourselves with that which we believe is “truth?” I am not saying that what you define as CSAM should be allowed to be propagated into the future on the timechain-rather I am saying that the beauty of the timechain is that anyone who believes anything of value should be recorded on this immutable ledger should be allowed to record that which they want - the market of the future will decide if it retains that value over time. I think there is a distinction there - I could be wrong - I could be right - but it isn’t about that if “sound money” or “immutable communication of value” is what Bitcoin truly represents…???