Peter Todd already proved you can get around the filters, at least the last time I checked in. There will always be circumvention methods. If you want a guarantee that CSAM will never be on a chain, then you will have an unprecedented, centralized governance structure retroactively acting as a node morality police.

CSAM is possible, but it will be once BIP110 lifts after a year and nobody made any progress, because these retards have escalated their rhetoric and vitriol.

Peter Todd is a CIA agent. Satoshi fucked off as soon as Gavin did his presentation to Langley; fuck off🤷🏻‍♂️.

I can't really stop his proof from being true, regardless of who he works for.

Csam will always be just as possible. A 4mb video of csam and 10000 smaller pieces that make up the same video are all the same content. It’s more expensive to break it into pieces and it bloats the chain a lot more but it is possible now and it is possible in a post bip110 world. This whole issue is retarded because like jr lost all his bitcoin and is a fed now.

It's possible. With or without 110. The only thing 110 does is make it non-contiguous, while ensuring it also has to bloat the UTXO set. But it's still accessible to those who know to look for it.

Bitcoin Optech

Bitcoin Optech Newsletter #379

This week’s newsletter shares an analysis comparing the historical performance of the OpenSSL and libsecp256k1 libraries. Also included are our r...

Still looking for the txid but this has been widely reported.

Did find this though while looking. May make for some amusement in the brief window after the chainsplit before the first 51% attack. Asssuming such a window actually exists.

GitHub

GitHub - djkazic/bpub: encoding data on bitcoin using valid compressed pubkeys

encoding data on bitcoin using valid compressed pubkeys - djkazic/bpub

The Mempool Open Source Project®

Explore the full Bitcoin ecosystem with The Mempool Open Source Project®. See the real-time status of your transactions, get network info, and more.

Found it.