I badly want to bookmark in jumble.social
Login to reply
Replies (16)
Put some bounties so @Cody have more incentive to prioritize this.
Where
Just say that you will pay x sats when this be implemented here: 
GitHub
Option to bookmark notes · Issue #90 · CodyTseng/jumble
Hi, Would be very useful to have an option to bookmark notes. Even an option to bookmark in a private or public mode. Thanks.
Since I'm developing jumble in my spare time, the progress might be a bit slow. I'll prioritize fixing bugs and issues that affect the user experience first, then work on what I think is important. If there's a feature you'd like to see in jumble, feel free to mention me, create an issue, or follow up on an existing one. The more people bring it up, the more likely I am to prioritize it 🤣
Thank you very much! 😊
I understand. I agree that issues that affect user experience is more important than new features. First fix issues, then implement new features.
The good news is that I don't think I have more issues to report, haha.
I totally agree with you (and @idsera) re quality of existing features over quantity of new features. Proper software development focus.
That said, I'll add a bounty promise to the new bookmarking issue on GH :)
I can work on your issues for quite some time now 🤣 Of course, I won’t be handling issues all the time, or that would be too boring. I might develop some small features on weekends. Such as bookmark 🌝
Would be amazing if we had an option to create issues/PR on Nostr and these things be Nostr events, so we could share, add bounties.... directly on Nostr.
cc @fiatjaf
I'm working on a bounty system, but haven't had much time for it recently
There are nostr git integrations in the works as well
Early repo of "Cattalax" up: https://github.com/vcavallo/catallax-ui
View quoted note →
View quoted note →
I just would like to be able to create an issue that is a nostr event, and people could add the intention to pay some sats when these be merged. If people that promised to pay, do not pay, this information could be public and this profile will have a bad reputation, as someone that does not fulfill its promises.
I could imagine extending my Catallax system to support crowdfunded bounties. It would work a little differently though: in my system, the money is sent to the escrow agent up front and held. If the goal isnt met, the money is refunded to funders. If the goal is met, the money is sent to the developer.
The problem is: who will be the agent escrow?
Whoever you trust to play the role. Probably based on reputation. Either programmatic reputation or "analog".
Would you trust Jack or fiatjaf to hold some sats and assess the work product? I would.
Or some npub who established himself as a reputable escrow agent over time.