> Where is the evidence of the goal to reorg thousands of transactions? Who said this?
it is how the fork is designed and how luke talks about it
Login to reply
Replies (4)
Thank you. I should have been more chill. Im running on fumes and still need my coffee. I really only get bitcoin news here and there on nostr. So I guess I did not see these posts from him. I will dig more into this.
A fork that activates right away does seem to be more preferable.
Also sorry to hear he accused you of that. I think people are making things too black and white and people on both sides are mischaracterizing each other.
Either way I'm hoping we at least agree people should run what they want in terms of Bitcoin code.
The BIP 110 is NOT designed that way and you are completely dishonest.
BIP 110 is designed to reduce spam on Bitcoin (which it will achive well if successful) and this is one of 4 scenarios. 4.


Issue#10: BIP-110: The Miner's Paradox
Sound money or spam database: Miners must choose what they're mining
You need to come clean once in for all: v30 is a direct attack on pleb nodes (BW, HW, legal liability) to kill descentralization and get few homologued nodes runs by your friend Andy and others Epstein buddys. Node runners ain't so stupid (I hope)
That's bs. CAT does that not BIP110.