Both capitalism and socialism are ambiguous terms

Incorrect. Socialism aka Marxism exchanged the former parasitical class with their own their vanguard party and selected friends and partners. The blood and energy drained from the valuable and productive plebs are extracted in the name of the "welfare" state. "Welfare" is the world communism of Friedrich Engels. What we understand and recognize as socialism, is Marxian socialism. The Marxist state in now cemented all over the world. We only have Marxism. Of course, Marxism is much worse for the national health than all other systems of the past because it is total in vision. Since the Marxist state is total in scope, it shall therefore be eradicated in its totality, which necessitates executing all Marxist state operatives across the board, including all professors, "doctors," psychiatrists, judges, magistrates, journalists, bankers, politicians, economists, teachers, et cetera. Socialism aka Marxism does not support the idea of voluntary exchange. Jew Marxism, including a social "democracy," is a parasite-slave system of gargantuan scope, and it is international in reach.

The terms capitalism and socialism are worn out relics of nineteenth century ideology. Both depend on centralization and political management. Capitalism, as it exists today, is not voluntary free exchange but a State protected hierarchy of corporate privileges, central banking, and legal monopolies. Socialism, in turn, replaces one master with another, trading the capitalist for the commissar, the market for the Ministry. Both are forms of centralized economics, where power flows downward and freedom upward only by permission. Neo-Agorism belongs to neither camp. It represents decentralized economics, an order of voluntary, bottom up cooperation. Not capitalism in the corporatist sense, not socialism in the collectivist sense, but a stateless market rooted in mutual exchange. The proper language of freedom is not “isms” but markets, real, living, spontaneous markets between free individuals.

Neo-Agorism Is Neither Capitalist Nor Socialist - Philippe Lemieux - IT, Design, Philosophy and Economics

The Case for an Evolutionary Market of Conscience Agorism was originally conceived by Samuel Edward Konkin III as a revolutionary counter economy, ...

To me Capitalism = free markets and private property Socialism = centrally planned economy and common property Todays western systems would in this regard best be described as "corporatism" where state and corporations are intertwined in governing