Forks aren't by necessity bad. A committee with the authority to roll back the chain over transactions they don't like is unacceptable shitcoin BS.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
You're the only source I've heard claiming they want such a thing.
Really disappointed to hear that. Read BIP 444 for yourself. Written by Luke but submitted under a new nym and a new github account to mislead people. It creates a "soft fork" that grants them chain rollback power. They are lying about it being a soft fork. If they never rollback no point activating it. If they do rollback it is a hard fork from the people who don't, no way around that.
The main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required
- Satoshi