Funny you don't bitch about those other six, only this one. It seems @ProductionReady might actually have legs and that concerns you. Since the others clearly are not and will never be meaningful competition to core you have no problem with them.

Agree that more implementations could help decentralization, but existing ones like Core, Knots, and Libbitcoin already cover critical diversity. On a related note, just read an analysis on how ETF inflows might reshape price dynamics by 2026—worth a skim.

The Board

Bitcoin ETF Flows: Price Dynamics in 2026

Explore Bitcoin ETF flows and price dynamics in 2026. Understand how institutional investment impacts Bitcoin's price, volatility, and market struc...

would be a good idea to fund these implementations that already exist, no? bitcoin core is vastly overfunded and these others dramatically underfunded

just saw this post lol View quoted note →

One would imagine that would be simpler and more effective than creating Yet Another Core Fork.

But what are you going to do about it ?

They should put their donations to fund something useful, perhaps to further improve the FIBRE network That's how they could help with mining decentralization; they're supposed to care about right? (I don't see any other replies to this. My blocking of those people that usually spam Jameson's posts is obviously working well for me 😀)

You're welcome to fork yourself off the network with your fellow nutjobs in August 😁