We desperately need more Bitcoin client implementations... if you conveniently ignore the fact that there are half a dozen independently maintained from-scratch implementations!
View quoted note โ
Login to reply
Replies (6)
Funny you don't bitch about those other six, only this one. It seems @npub1empc...ulnv might actually have legs and that concerns you. Since the others clearly are not and will never be meaningful competition to core you have no problem with them.
would be a good idea to fund these implementations that already exist, no?
bitcoin core is vastly overfunded and these others dramatically underfunded
One would imagine that would be simpler and more effective than creating Yet Another Core Fork.
But what are you going to do about it ?
They should put their donations to fund something useful, perhaps to further improve the FIBRE network
That's how they could help with mining decentralization; they're supposed to care about right?
(I don't see any other replies to this. My blocking of those people that usually spam Jameson's posts is obviously working well for me ๐)
You're welcome to fork yourself off the network with your fellow nutjobs in August ๐