Not defending Jack. I think he was based until he got involved in the suitcoiner treasury and credit shit. But I’m pretty sure Dr. Kruse was talking about Saylor, not Jack.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
I'm sure he was talking about Saylor, but he might be at the top of the list. It's unlikely Kruse was including Mallers, but Dixon explicitly named Mallers as sus because of the partnerships. Personally I'm glad Jack is taking on the role of being fiat bridge and bitcoin services. Nobody else is going to be breaking his back to perform and improve the way Jack does. Ita not like he's saying "buy my shitcoins" or "buy my security because it's just as good as bitcoin" or "I'll never sell my sats" or some other bullshit.
WTF is the point of money if you can never sell it? That's like collecting your grandmothes jewelery or garages full of your grandads tractors for sentimental. Not a store of value, that's a store of sentiment. Bitcoin is made to be spent. Its useless if its never spent. That is half of its core function. The other half is its digital transportability. That is what gives it its value.
I get it, don't sell your sats when you can spend your dollars first. No duh.
Sell your chairs before you sell your bitcoin. Fine, if you insist.
Store your money in bitcoin instead of dollars. Well of course.
Buy bitcoin and never sell it? Maybe not ALL of it, but that's not reasonable. The reason you have money in the first place is to be a "delay channel" for your wealth.
So, yes sell your bitcoin, but as little as possible and never sell your "nest egg". That's not just a rule for bitcoin, that's always been a rule for savings.