Most women actually also dont make the cut.
They have absolute zero evolutionary prowess because they were mostly too busy trying to show men that they can be men too.
They are further down the line, closer to the checkered flag of being evolutionarily obsolete than most men because of it.
And let's face it, whoever (male or female) owered themselves to being a labrat not 2 years ago, and now has developed the attention span of a fruitfly while they seemingly live like a potato bug (can't hear or see shit) have already failed natural selection. They are now dependents. Leeches on a cyst and angry at people like me for rupturing that cyst because the FIAT poison within it is not their lifeblood.
The truth hurts.
Login to reply
Replies (4)
Most men and most women are not childless. That's "the cut".
Men are significantly more likely to be childless than women, in most countries.
Is this more the case in first, second, or third world countries?
1.4 reproducing women for every reproducing man, averaging over hundreds of generations in Europe and West Africa. But only 1.1 in East Asia, and middling numbers in West Asia and East Africa. I'll chase up the paper if anyone wants it.
No, I have no idea why the regional differences. Culture, and marriage customs, but in what ways...?
Yeah, no shit
Because they can't give birth.