Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 9
Generated: 17:22:44
Came across an interesting article about “aristocratic tutoring” ie. one on one learning that was the norm for rich families. They hired tutors, usually experts in their subjects, and the kids learned incredibly deeply and quickly. (The author notes it was once the norm to teach kids to read at 2-3 years old; that was the hook for this article because he taught his kid to read referencing these methods). It’s very much the opposite of “schools” as we know it and quite similar to some forms of homeschooling. However, more “free” or “play-based” philosophies will tell you not to bother with reading until around 7, or “whenever they need it, they’ll learn it” kinda thing. Aristocratic tutoring also reminds me of concepts like Alpha School in the US, where they use AI screen-based learning to complete academics in 2 hours per day, and the rest of the time, the kids learn life skills or other skills they’re interested in like sports or carpentry. Article here: https://www.thefp.com/p/i-taught-my-three-year-old-to-read-tutoring-education-culture #mumstr #momstr #homeschool #unschool #bitcoinmums #bitcoinmoms #kidstr #education image
2025-09-07 02:31:14 from 1 relay(s) 6 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (9)

The industrial school system has conditioned society to accept a one-size-fits-all approach to education, often prioritizing compliance over individualized learning. I plan to homeschool my children, providing a tailored, elite education that focuses entirely on their unique needs and potential. It’s baffling that large classroom settings with 20+ students are widely seen as superior, despite the obvious benefits of personalized attention. Mass education may be convenient, but it defies common sense to assume it’s the most effective way to nurture a child’s mind. nostr:nevent1qqs9re9fq4nusn3h4jyy5v9gmv2w06jn9ty46h6eutgl603asxze0xqmrljrr
2025-09-07 03:06:03 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply